Proof of A U (intersect of B1 to Bn) = intersect of A U B1 to Bn

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhyno89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the set theory equation A ∪ (∩ from i = 1 to n of Bi) = ∩ from i = 1 to n of (A ∪ Bi). Participants emphasize the importance of demonstrating set inclusion in both directions to establish the proof. Key strategies include breaking down the problem into definitions and systematically verifying each inclusion. The discussion highlights that the proof requires understanding the properties of unions and intersections within set theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory concepts, including unions and intersections.
  • Familiarity with set notation and operations.
  • Ability to prove set inclusions and equivalences.
  • Knowledge of logical reasoning and definitions in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of set operations, focusing on unions and intersections.
  • Learn how to prove set inclusions using direct proofs and counterexamples.
  • Explore advanced topics in set theory, such as cardinality and power sets.
  • Practice solving set theory problems to reinforce understanding of proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory, educators teaching mathematical proofs, and anyone looking to strengthen their logical reasoning skills in mathematical contexts.

rhyno89
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove the following:A U (intersect from i = 1 to n of Bi) = intersect of i from 1 to n of (A U B)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i started off trying to rewrite it and make it a bit more readable
A U (Bi and Bi+1) = Bi+1 and (A U Bi)
then i was going to expand them and write the outcomes and show that they have the same as the proof

for the first part i got: AA ABi ABi+1 and both Bs

my problem is that i think i messed up the right hand side when rewriting it because that way the most i can get is 2 outcomes

any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is really simple set theory, not so much probability theory. If you get lost doing something like this, the easiest thing to do is break it down to the definitions and follow your nose.

For sets (events) C and D, the equation C = D means "both C \subset D and C \supset D". So, to prove an equation between sets, prove inclusion in both directions.

The inclusion C \subset D means "if x \in C, then x \in D". So, to prove an inclusion between sets, prove that every point in the first set is contained in the second one.

So, you want to prove A \cup \bigcap_{i=1}^n B_i = \bigcap_{i=1}^n (A \cup B_i). Break it down into proving the inclusions in each direction. So suppose x \in A \cup \bigcap_{i=1}^n B_i; you want to prove that x \in \bigcap_{i=1}^n (A \cup B_i). What does it mean for x to belong to a union? To an intersection? Follow the definitions, one step at a time. Then prove the reverse inclusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K