Proof of an elementary but very important result

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an elementary proof of the inequality \( x < \tan x \) for \( 0 < x < \frac{\pi}{2} \). Participants explore various methods of proof, including geometric, algebraic, and calculus-based approaches, while also addressing the definitions and properties of the tangent function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about proving the inequality rigorously and seeks the most elementary proof possible.
  • Another participant presents a proof using the mean value theorem, suggesting that since the derivative of tangent is greater than one, it follows that \( \tan x > x \) for \( 0 < x < \frac{\pi}{2} \).
  • A different participant offers a calculus-based proof involving the function \( f(x) = \tan x - x \), noting that \( f(x) \) is continuous and monotonically increasing on the interval.
  • Concerns are raised about the need to prove the continuity of the tangent function and the validity of its derivative before applying certain theorems.
  • One participant references a Khan Academy video as a resource for understanding the proof, while also questioning the feasibility of proving the inequality using calculus without prior knowledge of continuity and differentiability.
  • Another participant suggests that defining tangent as a power series could lead to a trivial proof, but acknowledges that this approach may not align with traditional definitions of trigonometric functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the methods of proof and the definitions required for the tangent function. There is no consensus on a single approach or the necessity of certain foundational proofs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate that the proof of continuity for the tangent function is assumed to be based on delta-epsilon definitions, which may not be considered elementary by all. The discussion highlights the varying interpretations of what constitutes an "elementary" proof.

dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,409
Reaction score
4,201
Alright, I know I'm kind of shaky when it comes to proving elementary things rigorously.

I'm looking for for the most elementary (in the sense of using least possible mathematical knowledge) proof that

[tex]x < \tan x, {} {} \forall \frac{\pi}{2}>x>0[/tex]

Geometrically ? I can't prove it...:redface: Algebraically ? How ? Using calculus ? I wish to see a proof to that, too...

You can also post links to freely available resources, if you know them.

EDIT: To make sense of post #2, the [itex]\pi/2[/itex] was missing when ILS wrote his post.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Umm :rolleyes:... [itex]\pi > tan \pi = 0[/itex]


I'm not really sure what you're looking for, but here's one proof for 0<x<pi/2...

According to the mean value theorem, for every 0<x<pi/2 there has to be a 0<c<x such that:
tan' c = (tan x - tan 0)/(x-0).

Since tan'c = 1/cos²(c) > 1, it follows that tan x/x > 1, and therefore x < tan x.
 
Another calculus proof. Let [itex]f(x) = \tan x - x[/itex]

[itex]f(0) = 0[/itex] and [itex]f(x)[/itex] is continuous on [itex][0 , \pi/2)[/itex]

[itex]f'(x) = \sec^2 x - 1 = \tan^2 x >= 0[/itex]

So f(x) is monotonically increasing on [itex][0 , \pi/2)[/itex]

Neither I nor ILS proved that [itex]\tan x[/itex] is continuous on [itex][0 , \pi/2)[/itex], but that proof depends on what you think is an "elementary" definition of trig functions.
 
I apologize, I forgot about ranges. Now it is correctly formulated.

@ILS Your attempt should be a calculus version. However, how do you prove that the tangent function is continuous (you need this to use the theorem) and how do you prove that the derivative of tangent is what it is ?
 
Last edited:
AlephZero said:
[...]
Neither I nor ILS proved that [itex]\tan x[/itex] is continuous on [itex][0 , \pi/2)[/itex], but that proof depends on what you think is an "elementary" definition of trig functions.

The proof of continuity is assumed to be the one with delta and epsilon. Tangent is defined as the ratio of sine and cosine which are in term defined as sides in a right triangle inside the unit circle => the name (circular) trigonometric functions.
 
The proof of what you want occurs in this khan academy video:

http://www.khanacademy.org/video/proof--lim--sin-x--x?playlist=Calculus

The inequality occurs in the first 8 minutes.

I don't think it's possible to prove this using calculus. Because, if you use calculus, you should already know about the continuity and differentiability of the tangent function. But to prove this, you use the inequality of your OP!

Unless of course you define the tangent as a power series. Which is possible. But then the proof is trivial. But it is less trivial that it actually corresponds to the tangent function of trigonometry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, Micro, I found it on You tube, too.



I was soo easy in the end to look for it, I mean. Anyways, it's nice to bring forth things that are seldom overlooked and taken as elementary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K