Proof of Cauchy integral formula

  • Thread starter stgermaine
  • Start date
  • #1
48
0

Homework Statement


For an quiz for a diff eq class, I need to prove the Cauchy integral formula.
The assignment says prove the formula for analytic functions. Is the proof significantly different when the function is not analytic?

Homework Equations


Basically, a proof I found online says that I take the integral of a larger contour C that encloses the contour C_r which is the contour that wraps around the cirlce of radius r around z_0. By the deformation principle, if r is sufficiently small, then the integral of f(z) around C and C_r are equal. I've tried searching for 'deformation principle' but none was of much help.


3. Questions
http://www.math.colostate.edu/~achter/419f06/help/cauchy.pdf

What is the deformation principle? I don't know much about contour integrals, so if someone can relate it to just regular integrals, that'd be great.

http://www2.latech.edu/~schroder/slides/comp_var/14_Cauchy_Integral_Formula.pdf [Broken] Pg 43

What is max C(r, z_0) supposed to mean? I think the this proof uses the same principles as in the first one, but doesn't explicitly use the delta-epsilon limit.

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
lurflurf
Homework Helper
2,440
138
Cauchy's formula for smooth functions is

[tex]f(a) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\partial D} \frac{f(z) dz}{z-a} + \frac{1}{2\pi i}\iint_D \frac{\partial f(z)}{\partial \bar{z}} \frac{dz\wedge d\bar{z}}{z-a}[/tex]

The proof is not that much different than for analytic functions other than for analytic functions the second integral is zero.

The deformation principle is that path between the limits of integration does not matter for analytic functions. For real integration this is also true (at least if the function is non pathological and the path does over emphasize a region).
For example if integrating from 1 to 4 is written I(1,4) we have
I(1,4)=I(1,2)+I(2,4)=I(1,3)+I(3,2)+I(2,4) and so on
For complex integrals there is more freedom because for each segment the path can be curved and twisted in endless ways.

max C(r, z_0) is the maximum modulus
the largest absolute value the function can obtain on the circle
 

Related Threads on Proof of Cauchy integral formula

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
987
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top