MHB Proof of Chain Rule for Differentiation - Stoll, Theorem 5.1.6

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation as outlined in Theorem 5.1.6 of Manfred Stoll's "Introduction to Real Analysis." The key equation in question is how the difference in the composite functions, g(f(t)) - g(f(x)), can be expressed as [f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + ν(s)]. The explanation clarifies that by defining h(x) = g(f(x)), the difference can be rewritten using the definitions of s and y as f(t) and f(x), respectively. This leads to the conclusion that the relationship holds by applying the properties of derivatives and the definitions of the functions involved. Overall, the proof hinges on the proper application of the definitions and the fundamental theorem of calculus.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I need help in understanding the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation, as presented in Theorem 5.1.6 in Manfred Stoll's book: Introduction to Real Analysis.

Theorem 5.6.1 in Stoll (page 173) reads as follows:View attachment 3925In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... By identity (3) and then (2),

$$h(t) - h(x) = g(f(t)) - g(f(x))$$

$$= [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]
$$
... ... "
I cannot see how (formally) the following equation is true:$$g(f(t)) - g(f(x)) = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]$$Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case?

I would really appreciate some help ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I need help in understanding the proof of the Chain Rule for differentiation, as presented in Theorem 5.1.6 in Manfred Stoll's book: Introduction to Real Analysis.

Theorem 5.6.1 in Stoll (page 173) reads as follows:View attachment 3925In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... By identity (3) and then (2),

$$h(t) - h(x) = g(f(t)) - g(f(x))$$

$$= [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]
$$
... ... "
I cannot see how (formally) the following equation is true:$$g(f(t)) - g(f(x)) = [ f(t) - f(x)][g'(y) + \nu (s) ]$$Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case?

I would really appreciate some help ... ...

Peter

It's because in the composition of the functions, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(x) = g \circ f(x) \end{align*}$, that would mean to have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(t) - h(x) = g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \end{align*}$.

But we ALREADY defined a difference in g functions as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g(s) - g(y) \end{align*}$, and thus that means to work out $\displaystyle \begin{align*} g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \end{align*}$, we must have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} s = f(t) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = f(x) \end{align*}$. Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} h(t) - h(x) &= g \left[ f(t) \right] - g \left[ f(x) \right] \\ &= g(s) - g(y) | _{s = f(t), y = f(x) } \\ &= \left( s - y \right) \left[ g'(y) - v(s) \right] |_{s = f(t) , y = f(x) } \\ &= \left[ f(t) - f(x) \right] \left[ g'(y) - v(s) \right] \end{align*}$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K