Proof of complex number identity

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
Gameowner
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached question

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The second part of question is relatively easy, it is the first part of the question where I need help with(using arg zw = arg z + arg w to show arg z^n = n arg z).

Also, is the question asking to proof de Moivre's formula with the identity arg zw = arg z + arg w? or just proof LHS=RHS?
 

Attachments

  • pic.JPG
    pic.JPG
    15 KB · Views: 533
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it's the induction that's causing problems. Show that it's true for z2. Then show that if it's true for zn, that it's also true for zn+1.

The second part uses the relation you proved in the first part.
 
The base case would be for z1, I thought. In any event, it's easy to prove.
The inductive case: assume true for n = k, show that it's true for n = k + 1.
Here's a hint: xa + 1= (xa)(x).69