Proof of Continuity: Solving Problem a and b

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter asif zaidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the continuity of the sum of two continuous functions, f and g, at a point z. The user, Asif, seeks clarification on whether the approach using limits is sufficient. The proof involves showing that the limit of the sum, (lim x->z)(f+g), equals the sum of the limits, which is established through the definition of continuity. The conclusion confirms that since both functions are continuous at z, their sum is also continuous at that point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the definition of continuity in calculus
  • Familiarity with limits and limit notation
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions of continuity
  • Basic concepts of complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of continuity in detail
  • Learn about the properties of limits and their applications in proofs
  • Explore the continuity of complex functions, specifically in relation to limits
  • Review theorems related to the continuity of sums and products of functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding proofs of continuity in real and complex analysis.

asif zaidi
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with the following proofs. If someone can help I would appreciate it.

Problem Statement

Given that f, g are continuous at z, prove that

a- f+g is continuous at z
b- For any complex [tex]\alpha,[/tex][tex]\alpha[/tex]f is continuous at z

There are other parts to this but if I think if I can get help on a) I think the rest will follow


Solution


The definition of continuous function is
(lim x->c) f(x) = f(c)

I have to determine if f+g is continuous at z. To do this I am proceeding as follows:

1. (lim x->z) (f+g) = (lim x->z) f(x) + (lim x->z) g(x)
2) Since (lim x->z) f(x) = continuous (given) and g(x) is coninuous (given) the sum will also be continuous.

Is this mathematically sufficient or am I missing a step.
My problem with proofs is that I use the result in my explanation which is a no-no.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks

Asif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
YIOu can either use directly epsylon, delta definition of continuity of a function, or you can approach it this way:
since f, g continuous at z, we have
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\ z}f(x)=f(z) \ \ ,\ \lim_{x\rightarrow\ z} g(x)=g(z)[/tex] now

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\ z}(f(x)+g(x))= \lim_{x\rightarrow\ z}f(x)+\lim_{x\rightarrow\ z} g(x)=f(a)+g(a)[/tex] which actually is what we want to show!
 
asif zaidi said:
I am having trouble with the following proofs. If someone can help I would appreciate it.

Problem Statement

Given that f, g are continuous at z, prove that

a- f+g is continuous at z
b- For any complex [tex]\alpha,[/tex][tex]\alpha[/tex]f is continuous at z

There are other parts to this but if I think if I can get help on a) I think the rest will follow


Solution


The definition of continuous function is
(lim x->c) f(x) = f(c)

I have to determine if f+g is continuous at z. To do this I am proceeding as follows:

1. (lim x->z) (f+g) = (lim x->z) f(x) + (lim x->z) g(x)
So you can use that and are not required to go back to "[itex]\epsilon, \delta[/itex] to prove it?

2) Since (lim x->z) f(x) = continuous (given) and g(x) is coninuous (given) the sum will also be continuous.
Isn't that simply a restatement of the theorem you want to prove? No, not exactly- I just reread it and while you just say "g(x) is continuous", you say "(limx->z)f(x)= continuous" but I can't make heads or tails of that. Surely the limit is not the word "continuous"! Perhaps you mean to say, "Since f is continuous at z, [itex]\lim{x\rightarrow z} f(x)= f(z)[/itex] and since g is continuous at z, ...", using that to show that [itex]\lim{x\rightarrow z} f(x)+ g(x)= f(z)+ g(z)[/itex] and then using that to show that f+ g is continuous. If your teacher is a real hard nose, you might need to show what "f(x)+ g(x)" has to do with "f+ g"!

Is this mathematically sufficient or am I missing a step.
My problem with proofs is that I use the result in my explanation which is a no-no.
It certainly is! I would strike you across the nose with a rolled up newspaper!

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks

Asif
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K