Proof of Dirac delta sifting property.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the sifting property of the Dirac delta function, specifically the integral property that states the integral of δ(x)f(x) equals f(0). Participants express confusion about the application of limits, particularly using epsilon to demonstrate this property. A suggestion is made to redefine variables and utilize limits from -epsilon to epsilon to clarify the proof. Additionally, a critique is provided regarding a PDF's definition of the Dirac delta, emphasizing the need for a different understanding of limits in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with limits and integration in calculus
  • Knowledge of test functions in functional analysis
  • Ability to manipulate integrals and change variables in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function in detail
  • Learn about the concept of test functions in distribution theory
  • Explore the use of limits in the context of distributions and generalized functions
  • Review examples of proofs involving the sifting property of the Dirac delta function
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying analysis or functional analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify the Dirac delta function's properties and applications in integrals.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


Prove the statement
http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/vlatex/pics/60_32c8daf48ffa5f233ecc2ac3660e517e.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I am clueless as to how I would go about doing this, I know the basic properties. I think it has to do with using epsilon somewhere and taking the limit as epsilon approaches zero, as shown here:
http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JohnMagorrian/mm/dirac.pdf
but I really have no idea how they're using it. The prof did something similar in class but he used -epsilon to epsilon in the limits of integration to show that the integral of δ(x)f(x) is just f(0).

Pretty mysterious to me, any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lavabug said:

Homework Statement


Prove the statement
http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-help/vlatex/pics/60_32c8daf48ffa5f233ecc2ac3660e517e.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I am clueless as to how I would go about doing this, I know the basic properties. I think it has to do with using epsilon somewhere and taking the limit as epsilon approaches zero, as shown here:
http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JohnMagorrian/mm/dirac.pdf
but I really have no idea how they're using it. The prof did something similar in class but he used -epsilon to epsilon in the limits of integration to show that the integral of δ(x)f(x) is just f(0).

Pretty mysterious to me, any help is greatly appreciated.

Two suggestions you might try.

1. If you have the result for f(0) try letting u = t-a in this problem. Or

2. Parrot your prof's proof only using an integral from a-ε to a+ε.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In your class, how is the dirac delta defined?


The PDF you linked makes a mistake in its definition of the dirac delta, or more accurately a (rather common) omission -- the limit isn't a limit of functions as you learned in calculus class. It's a different sort of limit, whose relevant property is that if \varphi is a test function, then
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \left( \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}^{\wedge} f_\epsilon(x) \right) \varphi(x) \, dx = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f_\epsilon(x) \varphi(x) \, dx
(the limit with the hat is the new kind of limit, the other limit is the ordinary kind you learn in calculus)
(and, for the record, the integral on the left is not the same integral you learned in calculus either)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K