How does the Cauchy product prove Faulhaber's formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the one
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the proof of Faulhaber's formula through the Cauchy product of two series. A key point is the transformation of the product of two series into a single series using the Cauchy product formula, which involves summing coefficients of the form a_{k-i}b_i. The participants explore how to apply a change of variable to manipulate the limits of summation correctly. The convergence of the series is also emphasized, noting that both series must be absolutely convergent for the Cauchy product to hold. Ultimately, the proof hinges on correctly substituting the sequences and applying combinatorial identities.
the one
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi
i have a problem with the the proof of faulhaber's formula given http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ProofOfFaulhabersFormula.html"

how is \left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{n^{k+1}}{k+1}.\frac{x^k}{k!}\right)\left(\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}B_{l}\frac{x^l}{l!}\right) equals \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\left(\sum_{i=0}^{k}\frac{1}{k-i+1}\binom{k}{i}B_{i}n^{k+1-i}\right)\frac{x^k}{k!}
??
thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Effect the change of variable
i=l
k'=k+l
 
I don't know how that would work with the limits. Wouldn't you still have \sum_{i=0}^\infty?

A simpler? if longer explanation is that the sequence on the right is the Cauchy product of the two on the left:

(\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kx^k)(\sum_{l=0}^\infty b_lx^l)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty(\sum_{i=0}^k a_{k-i}b_i)x^k

which is taking the coefficient of x^k on the RHS as the sum of all the a_{k-i}b_i with 0\leq i\leq k. This converges if both series on the left do and at least one (in this case both) are absolutely convergent.

Replacing the a_i and b_i from the given sequences and using

\left( \begin{array}{c} k\\ i \end{array} \right )=\frac{k!}{(k-i)!i!}

gives you what you want.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top