Proof of the Left Distributive Law for matrices.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Faizan Sheikh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Matrices Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of the Left Distributive Law for matrices, specifically the equation A(B + C) = AB + AC. The proof demonstrates that the general element of the left-hand side matches the right-hand side through matrix multiplication and addition definitions. The use of the Sigma (Σ) notation is clarified as essential for representing the sum of products in matrix multiplication, where each element of the resulting matrix is derived from the corresponding entries of the input matrices. The proof confirms that matrix multiplication adheres to the distributive property of real numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication and addition
  • Familiarity with the Sigma (Σ) notation
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, specifically linear maps
  • Basic understanding of the properties of real numbers, including distributivity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix operations in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of the distributive property in matrix theory
  • Explore the role of Sigma (Σ) notation in advanced mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the relationship between dot products and matrix multiplication
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, or anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix operations and their properties.

Faizan Sheikh
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Proof of the "Left Distributive Law" for matrices.

******A(B + C) = AB + AC******

Again we show that the general element of the left hand side is the same as the right hand side. We have

(A(B + C))ij = S(Aik(B + C)kj) definition of matrix multiplication

= S(Aik(Bkj + Ckj)) definition of matrix addition

= S(AikBkj + AikCkj) distributive property of the real numbers

= S AikBkj + S AikCkj commutative property of the real numbers

= (AB)ij + (AC)ij definition of matrix multiplication

where the sum is taken from 1 to k. S is the Sigma sign.
______________________________________________________________

Can somebody tell me why there is a sigma sign in the first step? Wouldn't the proof be correct without the sigma signs? How do they even derive the sigma or sums from the definition of matrix multiplication? Say we have a matrix A, and a matrix B, and say AB is defined, then the element in the first row and the first column can be computed by multiplying and adding the corresponding entries in the first row of A, and the first column of B. Now, for instance, k=1, then wouldn't AikBkj become (Ai1)(B1j), would simply mean the first column from A multplied by the corresponding entries from column 1 of B! But what is that supposed to mean? Shouldn't it have been the first row of A, and first column of B? Please help as soon as possible.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here 'k' is not some integer. It is the number of columns in first matrix ( which is equal to number of rows in second matrix)

It means an (i,j)th element of product matrix = sum of 'k' products of (i,k)th element of first matrix and (k,j)th element of second matrix.

| 1 2 3 | | 3 0 |
| 9 0 3 | x | 2 8 |
| 7 4 |

(1,1) element = 1x3 + 2x2 + 3x7 (k=3). So he used Sigma (S) in the proof.
 
come on. this is just a big array of copies of the distributivity law for dot product.

since a(b+c) = ab + ac, where these are numbers, multiplication by oner number is linear, and since the sum of linear maps is linear, the dot product is also linear, and a matrix product is nothing but several dot products. done.


aiyee I am blinded!:bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Can somebody tell me why there is a sigma sign in the first step?
You just did:

"then the element in the first row and the first column can be computed by multiplying and adding the corresponding entries in the first row of A, and the first column of B"
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K