Proof that e is irrational using Taylor series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the irrationality of the mathematical constant e using the Taylor series expansion. The key inequality derived is ##0 < n!e - a_n < \frac{e}{n+1}##, where ##a_n## is defined as a natural number. By assuming e can be expressed as a fraction ##e = \frac{p}{q}##, and setting ##n = q##, the proof leads to a contradiction when showing that there are no integers between 0 and 1, thus confirming that e is indeed irrational.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and its applications
  • Familiarity with factorial notation and properties
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities and their manipulations
  • Concept of rational and irrational numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Taylor series expansion for exponential functions
  • Learn about the properties of irrational numbers and their proofs
  • Explore advanced inequalities and their applications in proofs
  • Investigate other proofs of the irrationality of e, such as using continued fractions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in number theory and the properties of irrational numbers.

Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


Using the equality ##e = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!} + e^\theta \frac{1}{(n+1)!}## with ##0< \theta < 1##, show the inequality ##0 < n!e-a_n<\frac{e}{n+1}## where ##a_n## is a natural number.
Use this to show that ##e## is irrational.
(Hint: set ##e=p/q## and ##n=q##)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I manage to do the first part. Multiply both sides with ##n!##
##n!e = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{n!}{k!} + \frac{e^\theta}{n+1}##
Setting ##\theta = 0## and ##\theta=1## respectively we have the inequality
##0 < n!e-a_n<\frac{e}{n+1}## with ##a_n = \frac{n!}{k!}##.

For the second part assume ##e= \frac{p}{q}## where ##p,q## are natural numbers without a common divisor (except 1).
Set ##n=q## in the above inequality
##0 < q!\frac{p}{q}-a_q < \frac{p}{q(q+1)}##
Since ##q,p## and ##q+1## is positive we can multiply (divide) by these
##0 < (q+1)(q!-qa_q/p)< 1##
My hopes at this point would be to have an integer in the middle and hence get a contradiction (since there is no integers between 0 and 1), but that ##p## is in the way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Incand said:

Homework Statement


Using the equality ##e = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!} + e^\theta \frac{1}{(n+1)!}## with ##0< \theta < 1##, show the inequality ##0 < n!e-a_n<\frac{e}{n+1}## where ##a_n## is a natural number.
Use this to show that ##e## is irrational.
(Hint: set ##e=p/q## and ##n=q##)

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I manage to do the first part. Multiply both sides with ##n!##
##n!e = \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{n!}{k!} + \frac{e^\theta}{n+1}##
Setting ##\theta = 0## and ##\theta=1## respectively we have the inequality
##0 < n!e-a_n<\frac{e}{n+1}## with ##a_n = \frac{n!}{k!}##.

For the second part assume ##e= \frac{p}{q}## where ##p,q## are natural numbers without a common divisor (except 1).
Set ##n=q## in the above inequality
##0 < q!\frac{p}{q}-a_q < \frac{p}{q(q+1)}##
Since ##q,p## and ##q+1## is positive we can multiply (divide) by these
##0 < (q+1)(q!-qa_q/p)< 1##
My hopes at this point would be to have an integer in the middle and hence get a contradiction (since there is no integers between 0 and 1), but that ##p## is in the way.
From ##0 < q!\frac{p}{q}-a_q < \frac{p}{q(q+1)}##, you get
##0<p(q-1)!-a_q<\frac{e}{q+1}##.
I you could show that ##\frac{e}{q+1}<1##, you are done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Incand
Samy_A said:
If you could show that ##\frac{e}{q+1}<1##, you are done.

Thanks! We know that ##2 < e < 3## (this is easy to prove using the limit definition of e). If ##q \ge 2## then the inequality is obviously true since ##e < 3## and hence we have a contradiction.

The case for ##q=1## means we have a natural number so it's enough to show it for ##q \ge 2## as above.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Samy_A

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K