Proof: x is irrational => sqrt(x) is irrational

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmns
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if x is irrational, then √x is also irrational. The initial approach involves proving the contrapositive: if √x is rational, then x is rational. The proof demonstrates that if √x = m/n (where m and n are integers, n≠0), squaring both sides yields x = m²/n², which is rational. However, a participant points out that the proof should be conducted by contradiction rather than contrapositive, emphasizing the importance of understanding logical equivalence in mathematical proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irrational and rational numbers
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
  • Knowledge of contrapositive and contradiction methods in proofs
  • Basic algebra, including manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical proof by contradiction
  • Explore the properties of rational and irrational numbers
  • Learn about logical equivalences in mathematical statements
  • Practice proving statements using contrapositive and contradiction techniques
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of proof techniques in number theory.

mattmns
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
5
Ok so I am to prove: If x is irrational, then \sqrt{x} is irrational. So I started by trying to prove the contrapositive: If \sqrt{x} is rational, then x is rational.

So then \sqrt{x} = \frac{m}{n} For integers m and n, n\neq0

Then square both sides. x = \frac{m^2}{n^2}

This is clearly rational because m^2 and n^2 are integers.

Now, is this a satisfactory proof? I am sure it is, it just seems as though it was too easy. Did my teacher ask it because it shows how proving the contrapositive can sometimes make life easy? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct, and it is an easy proof. It boils down to this: Every square of a rational number is rational, and so these rational squares are the only numbers which have rational square roots.
 
Did my teacher ask it because it shows how proving the contrapositive can sometimes make life easy? Thanks.

Yep! Ideally, when you're posed with the problem of proving a statement, looking at its contrapositive should become second nature! With luck, you'll get to the point where you barely even notice the difference between A→B and ~B→~A!
 
Actually that is incorrect.
The negation of "irrational" is simply "not irrational". For a number to be "not irrational" has 2 cases. The number must be either complex (including i) or rational. Thus your statement of what the contrapositive is is not logically equivalent. This proof must be done by contradiction not by contrapositive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K