Properties of limits of exponential functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the properties of limits of exponential functions, specifically addressing the limit definition involving the natural logarithm. The key limit established is \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{1}{x} \right )^x = e, which leads to \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{a}{x} \right )^x = e^{a} for any constant a. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clearly stating assumptions in proofs and the significance of constants being non-negative. Additionally, it highlights the need for precision in mathematical statements, particularly when discussing limits approaching zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of the natural logarithm and its applications
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{1}{x} \right )^x = e in detail
  • Explore the implications of \lim _{x\to a} u(x) ^{v(x)} = u(a) ^{v(a)} and its conditions
  • Research the properties of limits involving logarithmic functions
  • Learn about continuity and its role in limit proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus and analysis, particularly those studying limits and exponential functions.

A dummy progression
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Prove the following properties (in pictures)
Relevant Equations
Using the def. Of natural logarithm
IMG_20220311_172438_515.jpg

I did only the the first three prop.
And on a means we have, on pose or posons means let there be , propriétés means properties, alors meand then.

I apologize i am a french native speaker and i am busy so i cannot rewrite this in entirely english
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220311_172432_730.jpg
    IMG_20220311_172432_730.jpg
    43.6 KB · Views: 157
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not convinced by what you have done for P1. Where did you use the properties of the natural logarithm?

In any case, you need to be clear about what you are assuming in your proof.
 
My guess is you are allowed to use
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{1}{x} \right )^x = e\tag{1}.<br />
For P1, the above implies
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{a}{x} \right )^x = e^{a}<br />
and therefore for any ##b\geqslant 0##
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{a}{x} \right )^{bx} = e^{ba}.<br />
The others are done similarly. Your task is to manipulate the limit to look like (1).

Be careful with statements like if ##x\to 0##, then ##y:= \frac{a}{x}\to \infty\ (a>0)##. This is true assuming ##x\to 0+##. It's clear ##a,b## are some fixed constants, but specify whether they are negative/non-negative. These details are important.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
PeroK said:
I'm not convinced by what you have done for P1. Where did you use the properties of the natural logarithm?

In any case, you need to be clear about what you are assuming in your proof.
I don't know how to do P4. But i proved all of the first three
 
nuuskur said:
My guess is you are allowed to use
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{1}{x} \right )^x = e\tag{1}.<br />
IMG_20220311_172432_730.jpg
IMG_20220311_172438_515.jpg

For P1, the above implies
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{a}{x} \right )^x = e^{a}<br />
and therefore for any ##b\geqslant 0##
<br /> \lim _{x\to\infty} \left (1+\frac{a}{x} \right )^{bx} = e^{ba}.<br />
The others are done similarly. Your task is to manipulate the limit to look like (1).

Be careful with statements like if ##x\to 0##, then ##y:= \frac{a}{x}\to \infty\ (a>0)##. This is true assuming ##x\to 0+##. It's clear ##a,b## are some fixed constants, but specify whether they are negative/non-negative. These details are important.
On pose : we set , on a : we have , alors : then.

I didn't find P4 . Could you explain it to me?
 
What is assumed of ##u## and ##v##? Details are important! Do you seek to prove
<br /> \lim _{x\to a} u(x) ^{v(x)} = \exp \left ( \lim _{x\to a} (u(x)-1)v(x) \right )?<br />
If so, then don't bother, for this is false.

It is true that
<br /> \lim _{x\to a} u(x) ^{v(x)} = u(a) ^{v(a)}<br />
assuming ##u(x)^{v(x)}## is well defined around ##a## and ##u,v## are continuous at ##a##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K