Proton electric polarizability and structure (recent measurement)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A recent precision measurement of the proton's electric polarizability at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has confirmed an anomaly previously thought to be a fluke. This measurement, utilizing virtual Compton scattering with a controlled beam of energetic electrons, indicates a significant deviation in the proton's electromagnetic structure from theoretical predictions. The findings, published in the journal Nature, highlight a bump in the data around 0.35 GeV², raising questions about the underlying causes of this anomaly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric polarizability in particle physics
  • Familiarity with virtual Compton scattering techniques
  • Knowledge of proton structure and electromagnetic properties
  • Basic concepts of high-energy particle accelerators, specifically the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of electric polarizability on proton structure
  • Explore advanced techniques in virtual Compton scattering
  • Investigate the design and construction of RF systems in particle accelerators
  • Study the discrepancies in proton measurements and their theoretical predictions
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear physicists, particle physicists, and researchers involved in high-energy physics experiments will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on proton structure and electromagnetic properties.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,501
Reaction score
7,424
A new precision measurement of the proton’s electric polarizability performed at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a bump in the data in probes of the proton’s structure. Though widely thought to be a fluke when seen in earlier measurements, this new, more precise measurement has confirmed the presence of the anomaly and raises questions about its origin. The research has just been published in the journal Nature.

According to Ruonan Li, first author on the new paper and a graduate student at Temple University, measurements of the proton’s electric polarizability reveal how susceptible the proton is to deformation, or stretching, in an electric field. Like size or charge, the electric polarizability is a fundamental property of proton structure.

. . . measurements of the proton’s electric polarizability reveal how susceptible the proton is to deformation, or stretching, in an electric field. Like size or charge, the electric polarizability is a fundamental property of proton structure.

. . . , nuclear physicists used a process called virtual Compton scattering. It starts with a carefully controlled beam of energetic electrons from Jefferson Lab’s Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility. The electrons are sent crashing into protons.

Measured proton electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions​

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05248-1Meanwhile - https://www.jlab.org/human_resources/recruiting/ELECTRON-ION COLLIDER JOB OPPORTUNITIES
Jefferson Lab is a major partner in the EIC Project and is providing significant contributions to the overall project management as well as the design and construction of RF systems, cryogenics systems, electron injector and storage ring electro-magnets, and experimental detector systems. Jefferson Lab is actively hiring engineers and designers for the initial phase of the EIC Project.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, berkeman and DrClaude
Physics news on Phys.org
The main result seems to be figure 4 with the discrepancy shown in 4a. It's certainly intriguing that several measurements see a bump around 0.35 GeV^2, but it's suspicious that the size of the bump decreases with increasing measurement precision.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
902
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K