I Proton electric polarizability and structure (recent measurement)

Click For Summary
A new precision measurement of the proton's electric polarizability at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has confirmed an anomaly previously thought to be a fluke. This measurement indicates a deviation in the proton's electromagnetic structure, raising questions about its origin. The research, published in Nature, highlights the proton's susceptibility to deformation in an electric field, a fundamental property alongside size and charge. The anomaly appears as a bump around 0.35 GeV^2, with its size decreasing as measurement precision increases, suggesting further investigation is necessary. This study underscores the complexities of proton structure and the need for ongoing research in nuclear physics.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,397
Reaction score
7,251
A new precision measurement of the proton’s electric polarizability performed at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a bump in the data in probes of the proton’s structure. Though widely thought to be a fluke when seen in earlier measurements, this new, more precise measurement has confirmed the presence of the anomaly and raises questions about its origin. The research has just been published in the journal Nature.

According to Ruonan Li, first author on the new paper and a graduate student at Temple University, measurements of the proton’s electric polarizability reveal how susceptible the proton is to deformation, or stretching, in an electric field. Like size or charge, the electric polarizability is a fundamental property of proton structure.

. . . measurements of the proton’s electric polarizability reveal how susceptible the proton is to deformation, or stretching, in an electric field. Like size or charge, the electric polarizability is a fundamental property of proton structure.

. . . , nuclear physicists used a process called virtual Compton scattering. It starts with a carefully controlled beam of energetic electrons from Jefferson Lab’s Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, a DOE Office of Science user facility. The electrons are sent crashing into protons.

Measured proton electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions​

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05248-1Meanwhile - https://www.jlab.org/human_resources/recruiting/ELECTRON-ION COLLIDER JOB OPPORTUNITIES
Jefferson Lab is a major partner in the EIC Project and is providing significant contributions to the overall project management as well as the design and construction of RF systems, cryogenics systems, electron injector and storage ring electro-magnets, and experimental detector systems. Jefferson Lab is actively hiring engineers and designers for the initial phase of the EIC Project.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, berkeman and DrClaude
Physics news on Phys.org
The main result seems to be figure 4 with the discrepancy shown in 4a. It's certainly intriguing that several measurements see a bump around 0.35 GeV^2, but it's suspicious that the size of the bump decreases with increasing measurement precision.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...