Prove A ∩ B ⊆ A ∪ B without Venn Diagrams

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piffo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the intersection of sets A and B (A ∩ B) is a subset of the union of sets A and B (A ∪ B) without using Venn diagrams. The proof is established by demonstrating that if an element x belongs to A ∩ B, then it must also belong to A ∪ B. The participants emphasize the importance of using the definition of a subset and logical reasoning to validate the proof, highlighting that all elements of the intersection are contained within the union.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, specifically intersection and union.
  • Familiarity with the definition of a subset.
  • Basic logical reasoning skills.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of set operations, including intersection and union.
  • Learn about formal proofs in set theory, focusing on subset proofs.
  • Explore examples of proving set equality through element inclusion.
  • Review logical reasoning techniques used in mathematical proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying set theory, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding formal proofs and logical reasoning in mathematics.

Piffo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that A intersection B is a subset of A union B without using Venn diagrams

Homework Equations



No relevant equations really

The Attempt at a Solution



What i am thinking is this:

A union B = A+B- A intersection B shows the intersection is within the union
So A intersection B = -A union B +A+B, which tells me the intersection is smaller than the union.


Can anybody give me some feedback please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you should be thinking about is this:
A is a subset of B if and only if for all x\in A, x\in B, the definition of "subset".

Start with "if x is in A intersect B then---", use whatever properties x must have because of that and wind up with "therefore x is in A union B".
 
Exactly what HallsofIvy said. Any time that you want to show something is a subset, you must show that all of the elements of the subset are also in the larger set. This one is particularly simple, because you only have two steps in the logic.

The same procedure can be used to show that two sets are equal. For example, if you want to show that the set A is equal to the set B, first show that all elements of A are in B, and also that all elements of B are in A. Then you can conclude that A and B are equal because they have the same elements.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K