MHB Prove Centroid Goes Through It

Thread starter slwarrior64
Start date Nov 4, 2020
Tags

Centroid

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the necessity of proving that a line or shape must pass through its centroid. Participants express understanding of the concept but struggle with the mathematical proof required to substantiate it. One user indicates they have resolved their initial confusion but seeks assistance with a separate, related question. The conversation highlights a common challenge in geometry regarding centroids and their properties. Clarifying the proof of centroid properties remains a key focus.

Nov 4, 2020

slwarrior64

I can see how it would go through the centroid, but I don't know how to prove that it HAS to go through the centroid.

Mathematics news on Phys.org

Nov 6, 2020

slwarrior64

slwarrior64 said:

I can see how it would go through the centroid, but I don't know how to prove that it HAS to go through the centroid.
View attachment 10812

I figured it out but please help me with the other question I posted!

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

View full post »

Thread 'Six Pencil Puzzle'

Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.

View full post »

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

View full post »