MHB Prove Centroid Goes Through It

  • Thread starter Thread starter slwarrior64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centroid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of proving that a line or shape must pass through its centroid. Participants express understanding of the concept but struggle with the mathematical proof required to substantiate it. One user indicates they have resolved their initial confusion but seeks assistance with a separate, related question. The conversation highlights a common challenge in geometry regarding centroids and their properties. Clarifying the proof of centroid properties remains a key focus.
slwarrior64
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I can see how it would go through the centroid, but I don't know how to prove that it HAS to go through the centroid.
1604545931408.jpeg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
slwarrior64 said:
I can see how it would go through the centroid, but I don't know how to prove that it HAS to go through the centroid.
View attachment 10812
I figured it out but please help me with the other question I posted!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top