MHB Prove/Disprove: Uniform Continuity of sin(sin(x))

solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
prove or disprove if the following function is uniformly continuous:

$$sin(sin(x)) $$ using the ε,δ definition
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know what that means? What IS the "$\epsilon, \delta$ definition"?
 
Country Boy said:
Do you know what that means? What IS the "$\epsilon, \delta$ definition"?
This is a challenge problem. solaklis wants you to find the answer...

-Dan
 
hint
[sp]Use the formula :
sinx-siny =$2cos\frac{x+y}{2}sin\frac{x-y}{2}$[/sp]
 
Country Boy said:
Do you know what that means? What IS the "$\epsilon, \delta$ definition"?
The $\epsilon$ $\delta$ definition for real function f(x) is :

Given $\epsilon>0$ there exists a $\delta>0$ such that :
For all x,y belonging the to domain of f(x) and $|x-y|<\delta$ then $|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top