Prove f has maximum value in R

  • Thread starter Thread starter lep11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a continuous function f: ℝ→ℝ, which approaches 0 as x approaches -∞ and has a value of 2 at x=0, possesses a maximum value in ℝ. The proof utilizes the theorem stating that a continuous function on a closed interval [a, b] must have both a maximum and minimum. By establishing that f is decreasing for x≥3 and applying the theorem within the interval [a, 3], it is concluded that f has a maximum value at some point x0 in this interval, which is at least 2. The proof is confirmed to be rigorous with a slight adjustment to clarify the use of the decreasing nature of f for x≥3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuous functions in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the properties of limits and behavior of functions as x approaches infinity
  • Knowledge of the theorem regarding maximum and minimum values of continuous functions on closed intervals
  • Basic understanding of function behavior, particularly increasing and decreasing functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions and their limits
  • Learn about the Extreme Value Theorem in real analysis
  • Explore examples of proving maximum and minimum values for various types of functions
  • Investigate the implications of function monotonicity on its extrema
USEFUL FOR

Students studying real analysis, mathematicians interested in function properties, and anyone looking to understand proofs involving maxima and minima of continuous functions.

lep11
Messages
380
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Let f: ℝ→ℝ be continuous function such that f(x) approaches 0 when x---> -∞ and f(0)=2. In addition, f is decreasing when x≥3. Prove f has a maximum (greatest value) in ℝ.

Homework Equations


Theorem: If function f is continuous on a closed interval [a, b], then f has maximum and minimum in [a, b].

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Because f(x) approaches 0 when x ---> -∞ then there exists a<0 such that a<0 ⇒ |f(x)-0|=|f(x)|<2. So a<0 ⇒ f(x)<2. Because f is continuous in ℝ, it's also continuous on a closed interval [a,3]⊂ℝ and there's the theorem in our lecture notes that says now ∃x0∈[a,3] such that f(x)≤f(x0) ∀x∈[a,3]. Since a is negative, 0∈[a,3] and therefore f(x0)≥f(0)=2. Because f is decreasing when x≥3, f(x)≤f(x0), when x>x0≥3.

The idea is to divide ℝ into intervals so that we get closed interval to apply the theorem.

In a summary:
##a<0 ⇒ f(x)<2≤f(x_0)##
##x∈[a,3] ⇒f(x)≤f(x_0)##
##x≥3 ⇒f(x)≤f(x_0)##

∴ f has greatest value/maxima in ℝ.

Is this proof correct and rigorious enough? I think I have made a mistake in the end when it comes to the fact that f is decreasing when x≥3.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the right idea. I would change your last inequality to$$
x\ge 3 \implies f(x) \le f(3) \le f(x_0)$$to make it explicit where you use the fact that ##f## is decreasing on ##[3,\infty)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lep11

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K