Prove if S and T are sets with outer content zero, SUT has outer content zero.

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets Zero
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the union of two sets, S and T, both having outer content zero, also has outer content zero. The subject area pertains to measure theory and the properties of outer content.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the outer content of the sets S and T and their union. There is an attempt to utilize the definition of outer content and the properties of rectangles that cover the sets. Questions arise regarding the approach to summing areas and the implications of taking limits.

Discussion Status

Some participants are engaging with the problem by discussing the necessary steps to show that the outer content of the union is zero. There is a recognition of the need to consider the coverings of both sets and how their combined area can be shown to be less than a specified ε. However, there is no explicit consensus on the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of applying the theorem regarding finite length curves and the implications of the empty set having outer content zero. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct method to prove the statement.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Suppose that S and T are sets with outer content 0, prove that SUT also has outer content zero.

Homework Equations



C(S) denotes the outer content.

C(S) = C(T) = 0

Also : C(S) = inf \left\{{ \sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k}\right\} where Ak is the area of one of the sub-rectangles Rk.

The Attempt at a Solution



So we want to show that C(SUT) = 0 using the fact C(S) = C(T) = 0. I'm not really sure where to start this one though. First time I've seen anything like it and a quick search yielded no results about outer content at all.

I do have one theorem though. If S is a curve of finite length L, then C(S) = 0. I also figured ( not positive about this ) that C(∅) = 0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Attached
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 506
hedipaldi said:
Attached

Hmm I sort of see what you're saying. I'm confused as to why you took your sums and unions up to ∞ rather than to n and then later argued as n → ∞, C(S) or C(T) → 0. So given any positive ε :

We take a set of rectangles R'k such that T \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{n} R_{k}^{'} and if I sum all the rectangles up to n, it will be smaller than (1/2)ε.

We take another set of rectangles R''k such that S \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{n} R_{k}^{''} and if we sum all these rectangles up to n it will also be smaller than (1/2)ε.

So hopefully I'm not mistaken here, but you asked me to consider the union of all the rectangles together.

So we take a set of rectangles Rk such that S \cup T \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{n} {R_{k}^{'}} \cup {R_{k}^{''}} and if we sum all these rectangles, it will be less than (1/2)ε + (1/2)ε = ε.
 
Yes this what i ment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K