Prove Limit of Sequence: Sqrt(n+1)-Sqrt(n) = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter tarheelborn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of the sequence {Sqrt(n+1)-Sqrt(n)} approaches 0. The subject area is calculus, specifically focusing on limits and sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the expression by multiplying by the conjugate to simplify the limit evaluation. Some participants question the implications of the sign when applying this method and discuss how to appropriately choose N in relation to ε.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing guidance on the manipulation of the expression and discussing the selection of N. There is a recognition of the need to ensure the correct handling of terms and conditions for the limit.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need to express the limit in terms of ε and to ensure that N is chosen appropriately, with some participants noting the importance of integer constraints for N.

tarheelborn
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that the limit of the sequence {Sqrt(n+1)-Sqrt(n)} = 0.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I must multiply by the conjugate to come up with 1/(Sqrt[n+1]-Sqrt[n]) and that the limit of this is clearly 0. I am having trouble solving this equation in terms of epsilon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful of the sign; multiplying by the conjugate gives you 1/{sqrt(n+1) + sqrt(n)}. For all ε > 0, there exists 1/m < ε for some positive integer m. (Why?) How should you choose N so that 1/{sqrt(n+1) + sqrt(n)} < 1/m < ε whenever n > N?
 
Ah, yes, the sign. Thank you! Now... To choose N, can I ignore the sqrt(n) part of the denominator since sqrt(n+1) > sqrt(n) so, being in the denomominator, the number is smaller? So could I let N = (1/epsilon^2) - 1?
 
That should work fine; by convention we let N be an integer, so you can set N to be the ceiling of what you have.
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K