Prove one to one using rank-nullity theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hwng10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of a one-to-one linear transformation from a finite dimensional vector space V to another finite dimensional vector space W, given that the dimension of V is less than or equal to the dimension of W.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the rank-nullity theorem and question how to define the linear transformation T before proving its properties. There is uncertainty about whether to prove the statement for a general T or to find a specific example. Some suggest defining a straightforward transformation and verifying its one-to-one nature.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem. There are multiple interpretations being explored, particularly regarding the definition of the transformation and the requirements for the proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the dimensions of V and W and the implications for defining a linear transformation. There is a focus on the need for clarity in the problem statement and the assumptions involved.

Hwng10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V and W be finite dimensional vector spaces.Given dim(V)≤ dim(W)
, prove that there exists a one-to-one linear transformation T : V -> W .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


What I want to prove here is to show that nullity=0
dim(V) ≤ dim (W)
dim(N(T)) + dim(R(T)) ≤ dim(W)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't prove that the nullity of T until after you have T! How are you defining T?
 
I really have no idea no how to prove this question . Do I need to prove it for general T or I just need to find an example which satisfies all the properties above ??
 
I suggest you go back and reread the problem! "prove that there exists"... First define an obvious linear transformation from V to W, then show that it is one-to-one.

Here's a simple special case: suppose dim(V)= 2, dim(W)= 3. Then, choosing some basis for both V and W, you can write any vector in V as <x, y> and any vector in W as <a, b, c>. Okay, what can you say about T(<x, y>)= <x, y, 0>?
 
HallsofIvy said:
I suggest you go back and reread the problem! "prove that there exists"... First define an obvious linear transformation from V to W, then show that it is one-to-one.

Here's a simple special case: suppose dim(V)= 2, dim(W)= 3. Then, choosing some basis for both V and W, you can write any vector in V as <x, y> and any vector in W as <a, b, c>. Okay, what can you say about T(<x, y>)= <x, y, 0>?

hint 2: if dim(V) = n, we have a basis {v1,v2,...,vn}.

since dim(W) ≥ dim(V), what can you say about any basis of W?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K