Prove Open Balls in an NLS are convex.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Convex
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 6K views
Oster
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Given a Normed Linear Space, prove that all open balls are convex.

A, a subset of the space is said to be convex if, for all pairs of points (x,y) in a, the point
z = x + t(y-x) belongs to A. (t goes from 0 to 1).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm

||z|| = ||(1-t)x + ty|| <= (1-t)||x|| + t||y|| [norm definition]

But, if I'm working with a ball centered at 0 with radius r then

||x|| and ||y|| would be less than r implying that

||z|| < (1-t)r + tr = r

Which implies z belongs to this ball around 0 with radius r.

So, all that's left to prove is that any ball B(a,r) = a + B(0,r)?

Am I correct?
 
Hi Oster! :smile:

(have an leq: ≤ :wink:)
Oster said:
Hmm

||z|| = ||(1-t)x + ty|| <= (1-t)||x|| + t||y|| [norm definition]

But, if I'm working with a ball centered at 0 with radius r then

||x|| and ||y|| would be less than r implying that

||z|| < (1-t)r + tr = r

Which implies z belongs to this ball around 0 with radius r.

That's right! :smile:
So, all that's left to prove is that any ball B(a,r) = a + B(0,r)?

you started with the wrong terminology :redface:

if your two original points are p and q in a ball of centre a, then your x is p - a, and your y is q - a :wink: