Prove Orthogonal Matrix Transpose is Orthogonal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Orthogonal
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the transpose of an orthogonal matrix is also an orthogonal matrix, which falls under the subject area of linear algebra, specifically matrix theory and properties of orthogonal matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of orthogonal matrices and question the completeness of the original poster's information. There is a suggestion to consider the Kronecker delta in the proof, but uncertainty remains about how to apply it.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on definitions and the original poster's understanding of orthogonal matrices. There is a focus on ensuring that relevant information is included in the problem statement to facilitate the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express concern about the lack of provided definitions or known data in the original post, which is typically expected in homework submissions. This has led to a dialogue about the importance of including foundational information when posing questions.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Prove that the transpose of an orthogonal matrix is an orthogonal matrix.

I think that the Kronecker delta needs to be used but not sure how to write it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definition of an orthogonal matrix?
 
The columns most for an orthogonal set.
 
Dustinsfl said:
The columns most for an orthogonal set.
Wouldn't that be information you should include in your first post, as either given/known data or relevant equations?

That's why those sections are in the problem template. We shouldn't have to pry that information out of you.
 
Mark44 said:
Wouldn't that be information you should include in your first post, as either given/known data or relevant equations?

I find that trivial because if I didn't know that, why would I be trying to prove anything related to orthogonal matrices?
 
How do we know that you know that? Our only evidence of what you know or don't know is the information you include.
 
Because I have no business trying to prove something I know nothing about.
 
So convince us that you know something about it by including the basic information when you post.
 
There's another definition of "orthogonal matrix" that's more common (I think), and definitely more useful in this case. (It makes the problem trivial). Do you know any other statements about orthogonal matrices? Something that holds if, and only if, the columns are mutually orthogonal?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K