Prove ∫ [t] dt = n(n-1)/2 in [0,n]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the integral of the greatest integer function, denoted as ∫ [t] dt, over the interval [0,n] equals n(n-1)/2 for positive integer values of n. Participants explore the properties of the greatest integer function and its implications in the context of definite integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the integral and the interpretation of the greatest integer function. There are attempts to break down the integral into sub-intervals and calculate areas under the curve. Questions arise regarding the correctness of summation formulas and the assumptions about the function's behavior at specific points.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and methods being explored. Some participants provide insights into the properties of summation and the geometric interpretation of the integral, while others express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches and calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definition of the greatest integer function and its application in the integral. Participants also reflect on the implications of their calculations and the assumptions made in the problem setup.

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
If n is a positive integer, prove that ∫ [t] dt = n(n-1)/2 in [0,n]

Solution:

sub intervals: [0,1] , [1,2] , [n-1,1]

each sub interval has base 1 and height 1, 2 , ... n respectively...

Thus: ∫ [t] dt = Ʃ [t](base) from i = 1 to n = n is base(=1)(1 + 2 + ... + n)

= 1 + 2 + ... n =/= n(n-1)/2

some help please...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miike012 said:
If n is a positive integer, prove that ∫ [t] dt = n(n-1)/2 in [0,n]
What function does [t] represent? Greatest integer function - [itex]\lfloor t \rfloor[/itex]? Least integer function - [itex]\lceil t \rceil[/itex]?
Miike012 said:
Solution:

sub intervals: [0,1] , [1,2] , [n-1,1]

each sub interval has base 1 and height 1, 2 , ... n respectively...

Thus: ∫ [t] dt = Ʃ [t](base) from i = 1 to n = n is base(=1)(1 + 2 + ... + n)

= 1 + 2 + ... n =/= n(n-1)/2

some help please...?
 
Greatest integer
 
Your only mistake is in thinking that 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n is NOT equal to n(n+1)/2.

If n= 3, 1+ 2+ 3= 6 and 3(3+1)/2= 6.
If n= 4, 1+ 2+ 3+ 4= 10 and 4(4+ 1)/2= 10.


It can be shown that, for all n, 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n= n(n+1)/2.

Here is a proof attributed to Gauss when he was a child:

Write
1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n and below it
n+ n-1+ n-2+ ...+ 1

And add each vertical pair. Each pair adds to n+ 1 and there are, of course, n pairs. That total sum is n(n+ 1). But that clearly adds the original sum twice. The sum itself is half of that, n(n+1)/2.

It is also fairly easy to prove this by induction. When n= 1 we have 1= 1(1+ 1)/2.

Assume that, for some k, 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ k= k(k+1)/2.

Then 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ k+ k+1= k(k+1)/2+ (k+1)

Factor k+ 1 out of the right side: (k+1)(k/2+ 1)= (k+1)(k/2+ 2/2)= (k+ 1)(k+ 2)/2 which is just n(n+1)/2 with n= k+1.
 
Miike012 said:
If n is a positive integer, prove that ∫ [t] dt = n(n-1)/2 in [0,n]

Solution:

sub intervals: [0,1] , [1,2] , [n-1,1]

each sub interval has base 1 and height 1, 2 , ... n respectively...

Thus: ∫ [t] dt = Ʃ [t](base) from i = 1 to n = n is base(=1)(1 + 2 + ... + n)

= 1 + 2 + ... n =/= n(n-1)/2

some help please...?

1+2+...+(n-1) is n(n-1)/2. What's the value of [t] for n-1<=t<n? Is [n]=n going to change the integral?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Your only mistake is in thinking that 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n is NOT equal to n(n+1)/2.

If n= 3, 1+ 2+ 3= 6 and 3(3+1)/2= 6.
If n= 4, 1+ 2+ 3+ 4= 10 and 4(4+ 1)/2= 10. It can be shown that, for all n, 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n= n(n+1)/2.

Here is a proof attributed to Gauss when he was a child:

Write
1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n and below it
n+ n-1+ n-2+ ...+ 1

And add each vertical pair. Each pair adds to n+ 1 and there are, of course, n pairs. That total sum is n(n+ 1). But that clearly adds the original sum twice. The sum itself is half of that, n(n+1)/2.

It is also fairly easy to prove this by induction. When n= 1 we have 1= 1(1+ 1)/2.

Assume that, for some k, 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ k= k(k+1)/2.

Then 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ k+ k+1= k(k+1)/2+ (k+1)

Factor k+ 1 out of the right side: (k+1)(k/2+ 1)= (k+1)(k/2+ 2/2)= (k+ 1)(k+ 2)/2 which is just n(n+1)/2 with n= k+1.

I know of that proof...
So i am guessing the author is assuming who ever is reading the book already knows that 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n is equal to n(n+1)/2?

I thought that there might be some way to solve [t] and directly get n(n+1)/2, instead of getting 1+ 2+ 3+ ...+ n then adding n+ n-1+ n-2+ ...+ 1 to it...
 
I thought of another way of proving it that seems more natural... please look at it and tell me what you think...

I created a step function then sections it off into a rectangle and a triangle...

1. area of rectangle = (b)(h) = (n)(1)

2. area of large triangle = (b)(h)/2 = (n)(n)/2

3. area of small triangle's = n/2Area of ordinate satisfying greatest integer function from [0,n] is the sum of these areas...

(n)(1) + n^2/2 - n/2 = n(n-1)/2..
 

Attachments

  • sum.png
    sum.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 412
Never mind I just looked at it and realized it does not equal n(n-1)/2
 
Miike012 said:
I thought of another way of proving it that seems more natural... please look at it and tell me what you think...

I created a step function then sections it off into a rectangle and a triangle...

1. area of rectangle = (b)(h) = (n)(1)

2. area of large triangle = (b)(h)/2 = (n)(n)/2

3. area of small triangle's = n/2


Area of ordinate satisfying greatest integer function from [0,n] is the sum of these areas...

(n)(1) + n^2/2 - n/2 = n(n-1)/2..

You did the algebra wrong. n+n^2/2-n/2=n*(n+1)/2. But yes, you work it out like that, but I think your graph is wrong. Isn't [t] the greatest integer less than or equal to t? Shouldn't [1/2] be 0? That's not what your graph shows.
 
  • #10
your correct... I realized that it was equal to n*(n+1)/2., which I replied back to saying that... and yes my graph is wrong... thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K