Prove that 11^2 does not devide n^2+3n+5

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbetan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that \(11^2\) does not divide the expression \(n^2 + 3n + 5\) for any integer \(n\). Participants are exploring the implications of modular arithmetic in relation to this expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of modular arithmetic, particularly considering the expression modulo \(121\) and \(11\). There are attempts to factor the expression and explore implications of divisibility. Some participants question the validity of certain steps in the reasoning process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of modular arithmetic, but there is no explicit consensus on the final argument or conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on integer values for \(n\), and participants are navigating through assumptions related to divisibility and modular conditions. The discussion reflects a mix of attempted proofs and clarifications on the steps involved.

rbetan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove that 11^2 does not divide n^2+3n+5; for any n.

In order for this to make sense n must be an integer.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



want to show that n^2+3n+5 is not congruent to 0(mod 121)

Assume towards a contradiction that 11^2 divides n^2+3n+5

we can rewrite n^2+3n+5=(n+7)(n-4)+33.

since i assumed that 11^2|n^2+3n+5 then 11^2|(n+7)(n-4)+33

(now is the part that i am not sure about)

but 11^2 does not divide 33. Therefore 11^2 does not divide n^2+3n+5.

I am not sure about this last step in the argument.

thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you need any clever factorizations to do this problem. The simplest factorization possible will give you a lot of insight. Assuming that my reasoning was correct, working in mod 3 is a good way to approach this type of problem (in fact, when dealing with squares, working in mod 3 or 9 is helpful; for instance, squares are congruent to either 0 or 1 in mod 3).

*EDIT* Actually, I think I made a mistake somewhere. Your argument can work but I think you are missing a step.
 
Last edited:
rbetan said:
since i assumed that 11^2|n^2+3n+5 then 11^2|(n+7)(n-4)+33

Considering the whole thing mod 121 quickly gets messy, and we see that 11|33 so we should instead try to see what we get if we consider it modulo 11 instead. From your factorization you should be able to see that,
11|(n+7)(n-4)+33
What can you say about n modulo 11 from this?
 
Ah thanks gunch. rbetan, you last implication is not justified, but gunch has provided the missing step.
 
hey gunch: I do not see how does it follow that 11|(n+7)(n-4)+33; can anyone explain this step.

Now taking for granted that 11|(n+7)(n-4)+33. then (n+7)(n-4)+33= 0(mod 11)

so (n+7)(n-4)=-33(mod11); but -33(mod11)=0; so (n+7)(n-4)=0(mod11)

so it follows that 11|(n+7)(n-7) then 11^2|(n+7)(n-7)

but 11^2 does not divide 33. Therefore, 11^2 cannot divide (n+7)(n-4)+33.

so 11^2 does not divide n^2+3n+5.

is this correct.
 
It doesn't follow, but it patches your original argument. The whole point is that we know 11 divides 33 but if 11 doesn't even divide (n+7)(n-4), then there is nothing left to prove because clearly 11^2 won't divide (n+7)(n-4) if 11 does not. Thus, we assume that 11 does divide (n+7)(n-4). Noting that n + 7 = n - 4 (mod 11), we know that 11^2 divides (n+7)(n-4) if 11 does, but now 11^2 does not divide 33, so 11^2 cannot divide (n+7)(n-4) + 33.
 
Using the quadratic formula and quadratic reciprocity you can show that 11^2 indeed divides (n+7)(n-4). Therefore, it divides (n+7)(n-4) but not 33. Hence it's not divisible by 11^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K