Prove that Associates Have the Same Norm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frillth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that any two quadratic integers that are associates must also have the same norm. The problem is situated within the context of quadratic integers and their properties, particularly focusing on the concept of norms and associates in algebraic number theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a relationship between the norms of associates by deriving that N(α) = ±N(β). Some participants question whether it is necessary for associates to have the same norm, exploring the implications of associativity and the properties of units with negative norms.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have provided insights into the properties of norms and associates, while others are questioning the validity of the original assumption regarding norms. There is no explicit consensus, but productive lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of units with negative norms and how they relate to the definition of associates. There is a focus on proving or disproving the original statement, with references to specific examples and properties of quadratic integers.

Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to prove that any two quadratic integers that are associates must also have the same norm.

Homework Equations



If α = a + b√d, the norm of α is N(α) = a^2 - b^2*d.

If two quadratic integers α and β are associates, α divides β, β divides α, and α/β and β/α both equal some unit, although each may be equal to a different unit.

N(unit) = ±1

The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I've done so far:

α/β = ε
N(α/β) = N(ε)
N(α/β) = ±1
N(α)/N(β) = ±1
N(α) = ±N(β)

From here, I guess I need to show that it is impossible to have N(α) = -N(β), but I'm not sure how to do that. Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry to go gravedigging here, but I just had a new idea. Is it even necessary that associates have the same norm?

α and β are defined as associates if α = β*ε

Thus, we can take any quadratic integer α in any quadratic field that has units that have negative norms, and multiply α by some unit ε with a negative norm to get β. Then when we take the norm we have:

N(α) = N(β*ε)
N(α) = N(β)*N(ε)
N(α) = -N(β)

Is all of my logic here correct? Because if so, it seems I may have been trying to prove a statement that is actually false.
 
Can you actually find two such associates?

By the way, have you actually proved either [itex]N(\alpha /\beta)= N(\alpha)/N(\beta)[/itex] or [itex]N(\alpha\beta)= N(\alpha)N(\beta)[/itex]?
 
I have proved all of your statements about norms.

In Q[sqrt(2)], 7 - 5*sqrt(2) has norm -1, which makes it a unit. I chose α = 2 + 2*sqrt(2) to test my initial assumption:

β = (2 + 2*sqrt(2))(7 - 5*sqrt(2))
β = -6 + 4*sqrt(2)

N(α) = -4
N(β) = 4

Did I do something wrong, or did I prove that my original assumption was incorrect?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K