Prove that dirac matrices have a vanishing trace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that Dirac matrices, denoted as M_i, have a vanishing trace. The matrices satisfy the anticommutation relation M_i M_j + M_j M_i = 2 δ_{ij} I, where I is the identity matrix. Utilizing the cyclic property of the trace, it is established that for i ≠ j, Tr(M_i M_j) = 0. However, the proof for each Dirac matrix having a vanishing trace individually remains unresolved, despite attempts using the definition of the trace and properties of matrix multiplication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with trace properties in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of anticommutation relations
  • Basic matrix multiplication techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of trace in linear algebra, focusing on cyclic permutations
  • Explore the implications of anticommutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the structure and applications of Dirac matrices in quantum field theory
  • Review proofs related to the vanishing trace of matrices in advanced linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as mathematicians interested in linear algebra and matrix theory.

elduderino
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Not a Homework problem, but I think it belongs here.

Homework Statement


Consider four dirac matrices that obey

M_i M_j + M_j M_i = 2 \delta_{ij} I

knowing the property that Tr ABC = Tr CAB = Tr BCA show that the matrices are traceless.

Homework Equations



Tr MN = Tr NM

The Attempt at a Solution



The square of each dirac matrix is a unit matrix according to the definition above. For i,j unequal

M_i M_j = - M_j M_i

Since these matrices are equal their traces should be equal

Tr M_i M_j = - Tr M_j M_i =- Tr M_i M_j

implying Tr M_i M_j = Tr M_j M_i = 0 for i \neq j

So far, I have not been able to prove that each of these dirac matrices individually as a vanishing trace. I tried

Tr M_i M_j = \sum_k \sum_r (M_i)_{kr}(M_j)_{rk} = 0

but can't conclude anything. This is embarrasing, as this seems pretty basic. Can someone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the cyclic trace property to show that
\operatorname{Tr}(M_i M_j) = \frac12 \operatorname{Tr}\left( M_i M_j + M_j M_i \right)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K