Prove that f is constant on omega

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Omega
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a holomorphic function ##f## is constant on the domain ##\Omega##. Participants explore the implications of the maximum principle and the properties of holomorphic functions, particularly in relation to the behavior of the function and its reciprocal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Cauchy-Riemann equations to show that both ##f## and ##-f## are holomorphic. They also consider the implications of the maximum principle and the mean value theorem in the context of the function's values. Some participants question the validity of certain steps and the handling of inequalities involving complex numbers.

Discussion Status

There are multiple approaches being explored, including direct application of the maximum principle and analysis of the mean value theorem. Some participants have raised concerns about the correctness of specific arguments, while others have expressed confidence in the validity of their reasoning. The discussion remains open with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the function does not vanish anywhere in the domain, which is a critical assumption in their reasoning. There are also discussions about the implications of this assumption on the validity of certain mathematical operations.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Screen Shot 2021-11-20 at 9.38.32 PM.png


##f(z)## is holomorphic on ##\Omega## so f(z) satisfies the C.R. equations, i.e.,

for ##f(z)=u+iv##

##u_x=v_y##
##u_y=-v_x##

and for ##-f(z)=-u-iv##

##u_x=v_y \Rightarrow -u_x=-v_y##
##u_y=-v_x\Rightarrow -u_y=v_x##

so -f(z) satisfies the C.R. equations and hence ##-f(z)## is holomorphic on ##\Omega##.

##|f(z_0)|\leq |f(z)|\Rightarrow |-f(z_0)|\geq |-f(z)|##

## |-f(z_0)|=sup_{z\in\Omega}|f(z)| \Rightarrow ## -f(z) is onstant in ##\Omega## by the maximum principle. f(z) is constant in ##\Omega##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Putting a minus sign*inside* the absolute values doesn't flip the inequality.

Hint: you are told the function doesn't vanish anywhere. You should make use of this fact. Which mathematical operation isn't valid when you plug in zero?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
Office_Shredder said:
Putting a minus sign*inside* the absolute values doesn't flip the inequality.

Hint: you are told the function doesn't vanish anywhere. You should make use of this fact. Which mathematical operation isn't valid when you plug in zero?
Well, the division operation isn't valid when you plug in zero.

so $$\frac{f_0}{f}\leq 1$$ but I'm not sure where to go from here.another way I tried to prove this without needing ##f>0##, but most likely some steps are incorrect.

##f## is holomorphic on ##\Omega##. The mean value theorem says that the average value of ##f## on any disc ##B_R## which is a subset of ##\Omega## is equal to ##f_0##, i.e.,

$$|f_0|=|\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{B_R(z_0)}f(z)ds|$$

If one assumes that there exists ##z_0## such that ##|f_0|\leq |f|## for any z, the mean value theorem requires that ##f=f_0## everywhere on the ball. It is obvious that this holds for the case ##|f_0|=|f|##, since the average of a constant function ##f_0## over its domain is just ##f_0##. We can show that this does not hold for the strict inequality case. Suppose ##|f|>|f_0|## for at some ##z^*\neq z_0## on the disc. The mean value theorem would yet say that the average of ##f## on the disc is ##f_0##. Yet the average value would be greater than ##f_0##.

$$| \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{B_R(z_0)}(f)ds- \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{B_R(z_0)} (f_0) ds|=|\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{B_R(z_0)}(f-f_0) ds|$$

where ##0<|f|-|f_0| \leq |f-f_0|## on ##z^*## assures that ##\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{B_R(z_0)}(f-f0) ds>0 ##, leading to a contradiction. So it must be true that ##f=f_0## everywhere on the disc. In fact, open discs form a basiss of ##\Omega## so ##f=f_0## on ##\Omega##.
 
Last edited:
You can also just apply the maximum principle to 1/f.

I don't think what you've done here is valid, since you've written things like ##0 < f-f_0##, but the right hand side is a complex number, not a real number.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
Office_Shredder said:
You can also just apply the maximum principle to 1/f.

I don't think what you've done here is valid, since you've written things like ##0 < f-f_0##, but the right hand side is a complex number, not a real number.
TY so much

##f## is defined over ##\Omega##.

since ##f\neq 0##, ##\frac{1}{f}## is defined over ##\Omega##

Let ##\frac{1}{f}=h## and ##h \cdot f = 1##. holomorphic functions form a Borel algebra so ##h## is holomorphic on ##\Omega##.

##|f_0|## is the minimum value of ##f## at ##z_0\in \Omega##. So ##\frac{1}{f}=h## attains its maximum value ##\frac{1}{|f_0|}## at ##z_0\in\Omega##.

##h## is holomorphic and attains its maximum on the interior of ##\Omega##, so the maximum principle leads to ##h## being constant on ##\Omega##, hence ##f## is constant, which leads to ##f=f_0##.
 
Last edited:
finally edited the mistakes and the proof is finally right... ?
 
It looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K