Prove that if A is contained in some closed ball, then A is bounded.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that a subset A of a metric space M is bounded if it is contained within a closed ball. The definitions of closed balls and bounded sets are central to the discussion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish the proof by considering the properties of closed balls and the definition of boundedness. Some participants question the understanding of definitions related to bounded sets and closed balls, while others provide feedback on the proof's correctness.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify definitions and validate the proof provided by the original poster. Some participants express confidence in the proof's correctness, while others emphasize the importance of understanding foundational concepts.

Contextual Notes

Hodgey8806
Messages
140
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Let M be a metric space and A\subseteqM be any subset:
Prove that if A is contained in some closed ball, then A is bounded.


Homework Equations


Def of closed-ball: \bar{B}R(x) = {y\inM:d(x,y)≤R} for some R>0
Def of bounded: A is bounded if \existsR>0 s.t. d(x,y)≤R \forallx,y\inA
Empty set is defined to be bounded in for these problems

The Attempt at a Solution


Spse that A is contained in some closed ball.
Let that ball be \bar{B}R(y0) = {y\inM:d(y,y0)≤R}, for some arbitrary fixed y0
1) If A=\phi, vacuously true.
2)Let A\subseteq\bar{B}R(y0)
Let x1,x2\inA.
The d(x1,x2)≤d(x1,y0) + d(x2,y0)≤2R.
Thus, diam(A)≤2R and we see that A is bounded.
Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So this is homework but you don't know any relevant formulas or facts? And you haven't made any attempt to do the problem yourself? Are you sure you are taking this class!?

What is the definition of "bounded set"? What is the definition of "closed ball"? If you know those, then this should be relatively easy. If you don't, nothing I say will help you until you have looked up those definitions (different texts may have slightly different definitions- you need to know definitions you are to use.
 
Sorry, I accidentally pressed "Enter" after the title lol. Please, see my attempt. I'm pretty sure it is correct; but, I want to make sure that I don't have to say anymore or elaborate on the empty set bit.

Thank you!
 
Hodgey8806 said:
Spse that A is contained in some closed ball.
Let that ball be \bar{B}R(y0) = {y\inM:d(y,y0)≤R}, for some arbitrary fixed y0
1) If A=\phi, vacuously true.
2)Let A\subseteq\bar{B}R(y0)
Let x1,x2\inA.
The d(x1,x2)≤d(x1,y0) + d(x2,y0)≤2R.
Thus, diam(A)≤2R and we see that A is bounded.
Q.E.D.

Yes, your proof is correct. I don't think you need to elaborate on the empty set case.
 
Thank you very much! I appreciate your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K