Undergrad Prove that if T is injective, T*T is invertible

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJ__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Injective
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If T is an injective linear operator, then the adjoint operator T* is surjective. This leads to the conclusion that the composition T*T is both injective and surjective, thereby proving that T*T is invertible. The proof hinges on demonstrating that if T*Tu = 0, then u must equal 0, which follows from the injectivity of T. Additionally, the discussion emphasizes the necessity of V being finite-dimensional for these properties to hold.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators and their properties
  • Familiarity with adjoint operators in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of injective and surjective mappings
  • Concept of finite-dimensional vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of adjoint operators in linear algebra
  • Learn about the implications of injectivity and surjectivity in operator theory
  • Explore the concept of invertibility in the context of linear transformations
  • Investigate finite-dimensional versus infinite-dimensional vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone studying operator theory who seeks to understand the relationships between injectivity, surjectivity, and invertibility of linear operators.

JJ__
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Suppose V, W are inner product spaces, and V is finite dimensional. I need to prove that if T: V-->W is an injective linear map, then T*T is invertible.
I'm using the notation T* to indicate the adjoint of T.

I got as far as to say that if T is injective, then T* is surjective. But I don't know how to show that T*T is invertible. Showing that T*T is surjective or injective would imply invertibility, but I'm not sure how to do that either. I was hoping to find a way to show that T* is injective (which would then imply that T*T is injective) but I wasn't able to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
im pretty rusty on this so double check for mistakes... to show T*T is injective u just need to show if T*Tu=0, then u=0.

0=<T*Tu,u>=<Tu,Tu>, so Tu=0. since T is injective, u=0

T*T is linear and injective and goes from V->V, so range of T*T must have same dimension as V, i.e. range of T*T is V itself, i.e. its surjective. looks like its important for V to be finite dimensional since this wouldn't apply if its infinite...
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
971
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K