Prove that PA=2BP in the problem involving parametric equations

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that PA equals 2BP using parametric equations. The derivatives and equations of the tangent line are established, leading to the coordinates of points A and B. The lengths PA and BP are calculated, showing that PA is twice the length of BP. The proof is completed by demonstrating the relationship through the triangle proportionality theorem. The conclusion confirms that PA=2BP, thus validating the initial claim.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
Let P be a point on the curve ##x=t^2, y=\dfrac{1}{t}##. If the tangents to the curve at P meets the x- and y-axes at A and B respectively, prove that PA=2BP.
Relevant Equations
Parametric equations
My take;

##\dfrac{dy}{dx}=\dfrac{-1}{t^2}⋅\dfrac{1}{2t}=\dfrac{-1}{2t^3}##

The equation of the tangent line AB is given by;

##y-\dfrac{1}{t}=\dfrac{-1}{2t^3}(x-t^2)##

##ty=\dfrac{-1}{2t^2}(x-t^2)+1##

At point A, ##(x,y)=(3t^2,0)##

At point B, ##(x,y)=(0,1.5t)##

PA=##\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}##

=##\sqrt{(t^2-3t^2)^2+(\dfrac{1}{t}-0)^2}##
...

= ##\dfrac{\sqrt{4t^6+1}}{t}##


BP=##\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}##

=##\sqrt{(t^2-0)^2+(\dfrac{1}{t}-\dfrac{1.5}{t})^2}##
...

= ##\dfrac{\sqrt{4t^6+1}}{2t}##

it follows that ##\dfrac{PA}{BP}##=##\dfrac{\sqrt{4t^6+1}}{t}\div\dfrac{\sqrt{4t^6+1}}{2t}=2##

##⇒PA=2BP##thus proved.

insight welcome or other approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
insight welcome or other approach.
You can use tools such as https://www.geogebra.org/m/cAsHbXEU to plot the curve.

Draw the tangent, AB, at some arbitrary point P.

Drop a perpendicular from P ##(t^2, \frac 1t)##.to meet the (say) x-axis at Q. Note that Q has coordinates ##(t^2, 0)##

You have already established that point A is ##(3t^2,0)##. You can now complete the proof using proportionality (the triangle proportionality theorem).
 
Parametrize the tangent as <br /> (t^2, t^{-1}) + \lambda(2t, -t^{-2}). From here it is straightforward to find the intercepts at A = (3t^2,0) and B = (0, \frac32t^{-1}) and then compute <br /> \begin{split}<br /> |PA| &amp;= \sqrt{ (2t^2)^2 + (-t^{-1})^2 } = \sqrt{ 4t^4 + t^{-2}} \\<br /> |PB| &amp;= \sqrt { (-t^2)^2 + \left(\tfrac12 t^{-1}\right)^2 } = \sqrt{ t^4 + \tfrac14t^{-2}} \\<br /> &amp;= \tfrac12 |PA|<br /> \end{split}
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...