Prove that the set of all vectors is a subspace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that specific sets of vectors in R3 are subspaces. Part (a) establishes that the set of all vectors \(\vec{x}\) satisfying \(\vec{a} \cdot \vec{x} = 0\) forms a subspace, as it represents a plane through the origin perpendicular to vector \(\vec{a}\). The proof involves demonstrating that linear combinations of vectors in this set remain orthogonal to \(\vec{a}\). In part (b), the set of vectors satisfying \(\vec{a} \times \vec{x} = 0\) is also a subspace, as it consists of vectors parallel to \(\vec{a}\), confirmed through properties of the cross product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces in R3
  • Knowledge of dot product and its geometric interpretation
  • Familiarity with cross product and its properties
  • Ability to perform linear algebraic proofs involving vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of subspaces in R3
  • Learn about the properties of the dot product and cross product in vector analysis
  • Explore linear combinations of vectors and their implications for subspaces
  • Investigate additional examples of subspaces in higher-dimensional vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians working with vector spaces, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of subspaces in R3.

danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Let [tex]\vec{a} \ne 0[/tex] be a fixed vector in R3.

(a) Prove that the set of all vectors [tex]\vec{x} \in R^3[/tex] satisfying [tex]\vec{a}.\vec{x}=0[/tex] is a subspace of R^3. Describe this set geometrically.

(b) Is the set of all vectors [tex]\vec{x} \in R^3[/tex] satisfying [tex]\vec{a} \times \vec{x}=0[/tex] a subspace of R3?
For part (a), i thought about the problem geometrically and id be inclined to say that it is a subspace. The zero dot product implies that a and x are orthogonal, and so the set of all x will be a plane through the origin (since <0,0>.a=0 for any a) which is perpendicular to a.

Analytically, i proved it by letting p and q be vectors such that p.a=q.a=0. I then showed that any linear combination of these two vectors is also perpendicular to a.

(kp+lq).a=k(p.a)+l(q.a)=0

Is that correct?

Its part (b) where I am a bit stuck. If the cross product of two vectors is the zero vector, this implies that they are parallel, yea? So x is some element of the set of all vectors which are parallel to a? Since the linear combination of any two vectors parallel to a will also be parallel to a, can we conclude that the set of all x is a subspace of R3?

Now, if my reasoning is correct, how could i go about showing this analytically? I guess it comes down to showing that the cross product being zero implies that the vectors are parallel; once i can show this i can do the rest myself.

Thanks in advance,
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can do (b) the same way you did (a). Just use the properties of cross product to do so.
 


Defennder said:
You can do (b) the same way you did (a). Just use the properties of cross product to do so.

Oh...ofcourse..haha don't know why i didnt do that. Guess its time for bed :-p Thanks for the quick reply :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K