Show that a set of vectors spans a subspace

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that a specific set of vectors, {(1, 2, 3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 5, 6)}, does not span R3 but spans a subspace defined by the plane equation x - 2y + z = 0. The context is linear algebra, focusing on vector spaces and spans.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for determining the rank of the matrix formed by the vectors and its implications for spanning R3. There are attempts to express vectors in the plane as linear combinations of the given vectors. Questions arise about finding explicit coefficients and the methods used to demonstrate the span of the subspace.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to expressing vectors in the plane as linear combinations of the original vectors. Some participants provide calculations and suggest methods, while others seek clarification on these methods. There is an ongoing exploration of how to effectively demonstrate the spanning of the subspace.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the methods presented in the solutions manual and the lack of alignment with textbook material. There are indications of missing information or assumptions that may affect the understanding of the problem.

mattqchou
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that {(1, 2, 3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 5, 6)} does not span R3. Show that it spans the subspace of R3 consisting of all vectors lying in the plane with the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I made a matrix of:
A = [ 1 3 4 ; 2 4 5; 3 5 6] and reduced it to row-echelon form to determine rank. I found that rank(A) = 2. Therefore, it can't span R3, since rank(A) < n for Rn.

But then I need to show that it spans the plane given by the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

I thought that perhaps rewriting the problem as: z = -x + 2y and plugging back in for z. But that doesn't really tell me anything.

I also tried to show the span by demonstrating where it has linear combinations by writing span(F) = span{ax - 2by + cz = 0} but I don't know what to do from here.

I was able to find the solution in the solutions manual, but I can't decipher what it's saying or how it did it. It's not using a method described in the book.

lateximg_large.png


Could someone explain this better or give me another method to figure out whether a set spans a subspace?
 

Attachments

  • lateximg_large.png
    lateximg_large.png
    45 KB · Views: 2,609
Physics news on Phys.org
They find explicit coefficients for the vectors (1,2,3) and (3,4,5) to express every vector in the plane as linear combination of these vectors.
The coefficients are (-2x+3y/2) and (x-y/2). Multiply them with the vectors, simplify and you get a general vector in the discussed plane.
 
mfb said:
They find explicit coefficients for the vectors (1,2,3) and (3,4,5) to express every vector in the plane as linear combination of these vectors.
The coefficients are (-2x+3y/2) and (x-y/2). Multiply them with the vectors, simplify and you get a general vector in the discussed plane.
Hi,

Could you explain how you find explicit coefficients? I've never heard of this method in my class before. I also can't find that in the book or the glossary.

Thanks!
 
See the calculation above, it does exactly this.
It starts with an arbitrary vector in the plane and assumes that it can be written as ##\alpha (1,2,3) + \beta (3,4,5)## and then solves for the two unknowns.
 
mattqchou said:
But then I need to show that it spans the plane given by the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

I thought that perhaps rewriting the problem as: z = -x + 2y and plugging back in for z. But that doesn't really tell me anything.
Sure it does. You now have three equations that describe the vectors that lie in that plane:
\begin{align*}
x &= s \\
y &= t \\
z &= -s + 2t
\end{align*} or in vector form,
$$\begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} = s\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ -1\end{pmatrix} + t\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}.$$ Can you take it from there?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K