Prove that this function is Riemann integrable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Riemann
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Riemann integrability of a bounded function that is continuous on a closed interval except at a countable set of points converging to one endpoint. The original poster is specifically focused on the integrability of the function on a subinterval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the function's continuity and the behavior of integrals over subintervals. Questions about the context of integration (Riemann vs. Lebesgue) and the definition of convergence are raised. There is also a discussion about the conditions required for the convergence of a series.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining different aspects of the proof and questioning assumptions about convergence and continuity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for finite discontinuities, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the nature of the discontinuities and the behavior of the integral as the sequence of points converges. The original poster has identified a flaw in their reasoning regarding the convergence of a series, indicating a need for further exploration of the proof's requirements.

Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Let f:[a,b]->R be bounded. Further, let it be continuous on [a,b] except at points a1, a2, ...,an,... such that a1>a2>a3>...>an>...> a where an converges to a. Prove that f is Riemann integrable on [a,b].

It suffices to prove that f is integrable on [a,a1) (I've worked out that part). And that's what I'm having trouble with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you dealing strictly with Riemann integration, or is this proof done in the context of Lebesgue integration?

One might start out by noting that:

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = \int_{a_1}^{b} f(x)dx + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{n} \int_{a_{k-1}}^{a_{k}} f(x)dx[/tex]
 
Riemann. And I had already figured out that part. What I'm having trouble with is that I must show the terms [tex]\int_{a_n}^{a_{n+1}}f \rightarrow 0[/tex] as [tex]n\rightarrow \infty[/tex]. Since the series is bounded, showing that the terms converge to 0 will imply the convergence of the series.
 
What is the definition of convergence of a sequence, say a_n ?
 
If I got by antiderivatives, that is F(a_n+1)-F(a_n), there's no way to garantee the continuity of F (where F' = f). However since F is bounded by M, the integral is bounded below and above by +/-M(a_n+1 - a_n) which squeezes the integral to zero by convergence of a_n.
 
So you have an infinite sequence of points an[/b] that converge to a such that f is discontinuous at those points? You need more than that: you will also need that there is only a finite step discontinuity at those points.
 
I found a flaw in my argument. If a series is bounded, and the terms converge to zero, it DOES NOT imply the convergence of the series. I'll have to try another approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K