Prove that this function is Riemann integrable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Treadstone 71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Riemann
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Let f:[a,b]->R be bounded. Further, let it be continuous on [a,b] except at points a1, a2, ...,an,... such that a1>a2>a3>...>an>...> a where an converges to a. Prove that f is Riemann integrable on [a,b].

It suffices to prove that f is integrable on [a,a1) (I've worked out that part). And that's what I'm having trouble with.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you dealing strictly with Riemann integration, or is this proof done in the context of Lebesgue integration?

One might start out by noting that:

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = \int_{a_1}^{b} f(x)dx + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sum_{k=2}^{n} \int_{a_{k-1}}^{a_{k}} f(x)dx[/tex]
 
Riemann. And I had already figured out that part. What I'm having trouble with is that I must show the terms [tex]\int_{a_n}^{a_{n+1}}f \rightarrow 0[/tex] as [tex]n\rightarrow \infty[/tex]. Since the series is bounded, showing that the terms converge to 0 will imply the convergence of the series.
 
If I got by antiderivatives, that is F(a_n+1)-F(a_n), there's no way to garantee the continuity of F (where F' = f). However since F is bounded by M, the integral is bounded below and above by +/-M(a_n+1 - a_n) which squeezes the integral to zero by convergence of a_n.
 
So you have an infinite sequence of points an[/b] that converge to a such that f is discontinuous at those points? You need more than that: you will also need that there is only a finite step discontinuity at those points.
 
I found a flaw in my argument. If a series is bounded, and the terms converge to zero, it DOES NOT imply the convergence of the series. I'll have to try another approach.