MHB Prove that this matrix equation has no roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Roots
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote an unsolved problem from another forum.

Could you explain to me how to solve "more sophisticated" matrix equations such as this one?

Prove that 2x^2 + x = \begin{bmatrix} -1&5&3\\-2&1&2\\0&-4&-3\end{bmatrix} has no solutions in M(3,3;R), where M(3,3;R) is the space of all matrices 3x3 with real entries.

The characteristic polynomial of the given matrix $M$ is $\chi (\lambda)=-\lambda^3-3\lambda^2-17\lambda-11$. The derivative $\chi'(\lambda)=-2\lambda^2-6\lambda-17$ has no real roots and $\chi'(0)<0$, so $\chi'(\lambda)<0$ for all $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$ which means that $\chi$ is strictly decreasing in $\mathbb{R}$.

On the other hand, $\chi(-1)=4>0$ and $\chi(-1/2)=-25/8<0$. According to Bolzano's theorem, $\chi$ has a root $\beta\in (-1,-1/2)$. We conclude that $\beta$ is the only real eigenvalue of $M$.

Suppose that there exists $X\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times 3}$ such that $2X^2+X=M$. Let $\alpha$ be a real eigenvalue of $X$ (there is as least one because 3 is odd), then $2\alpha^2+\alpha$ is a real eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$ and one of those $\alpha$ must verify $2\alpha^2+\alpha=\beta$.

But $f(\alpha)=2\alpha^2+\alpha-\beta$ has an absolute minimum at $\alpha=-1/4$ and $f(-1/4)=-1/8-\beta>0$ which is a contradicction. So, the given equation has no solution.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice!

Fernando Revilla said:
then $2\alpha^2+\alpha$ is a real eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$ and one of those $\alpha$ must verify $2\alpha^2+\alpha=\beta$.

Suppose z is an imaginary eigenvalue of X.
Then $2z^2+z$ is an eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$.
This eigenvalue could be real, couldn't it?
 
ILikeSerena said:
Nice! Suppose z is an imaginary eigenvalue of X.
Then $2z^2+z$ is an eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$.
This eigenvalue could be real, couldn't it?

Yes a priori, but in such case there would be two linearly independent vectors $v_1,v_2\in\mathbb{R}^3$ such that:

$(2X^2+X)v_1=(2\alpha^2+\alpha)v_1=\beta v_1$
$(2X^2+X)v_2=(2z^2+z)v_2=\beta v_2$

Then, $\beta$ would be an eigenvalue of $M$ at least double. Contradiction.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top