Prove that this matrix equation has no roots

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Roots
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The matrix equation 2X² + X = M, where M is defined as the matrix \begin{bmatrix} -1&5&3\\-2&1&2\\0&-4&-3\end{bmatrix}, has no solutions in the space of 3x3 matrices with real entries, M(3,3;R). The characteristic polynomial of M is given by χ(λ) = -λ³ - 3λ² - 17λ - 11, which is strictly decreasing and has one real eigenvalue β in the interval (-1, -1/2). The function f(α) = 2α² + α - β has a minimum at α = -1/4, yielding a contradiction that confirms the absence of solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix theory and eigenvalues
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials
  • Knowledge of Bolzano's theorem
  • Basic calculus, particularly derivatives and minima
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of characteristic polynomials in linear algebra
  • Learn about eigenvalues and eigenvectors in matrix equations
  • Explore Bolzano's theorem and its applications in real analysis
  • Investigate the implications of imaginary eigenvalues in matrix equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and eigenvalue problems.

Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote an unsolved problem from another forum.

Could you explain to me how to solve "more sophisticated" matrix equations such as this one?

Prove that 2x^2 + x = \begin{bmatrix} -1&5&3\\-2&1&2\\0&-4&-3\end{bmatrix} has no solutions in M(3,3;R), where M(3,3;R) is the space of all matrices 3x3 with real entries.

The characteristic polynomial of the given matrix $M$ is $\chi (\lambda)=-\lambda^3-3\lambda^2-17\lambda-11$. The derivative $\chi'(\lambda)=-2\lambda^2-6\lambda-17$ has no real roots and $\chi'(0)<0$, so $\chi'(\lambda)<0$ for all $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$ which means that $\chi$ is strictly decreasing in $\mathbb{R}$.

On the other hand, $\chi(-1)=4>0$ and $\chi(-1/2)=-25/8<0$. According to Bolzano's theorem, $\chi$ has a root $\beta\in (-1,-1/2)$. We conclude that $\beta$ is the only real eigenvalue of $M$.

Suppose that there exists $X\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times 3}$ such that $2X^2+X=M$. Let $\alpha$ be a real eigenvalue of $X$ (there is as least one because 3 is odd), then $2\alpha^2+\alpha$ is a real eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$ and one of those $\alpha$ must verify $2\alpha^2+\alpha=\beta$.

But $f(\alpha)=2\alpha^2+\alpha-\beta$ has an absolute minimum at $\alpha=-1/4$ and $f(-1/4)=-1/8-\beta>0$ which is a contradicction. So, the given equation has no solution.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice!

Fernando Revilla said:
then $2\alpha^2+\alpha$ is a real eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$ and one of those $\alpha$ must verify $2\alpha^2+\alpha=\beta$.

Suppose z is an imaginary eigenvalue of X.
Then $2z^2+z$ is an eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$.
This eigenvalue could be real, couldn't it?
 
ILikeSerena said:
Nice! Suppose z is an imaginary eigenvalue of X.
Then $2z^2+z$ is an eigenvalue of $2X^2+X$.
This eigenvalue could be real, couldn't it?

Yes a priori, but in such case there would be two linearly independent vectors $v_1,v_2\in\mathbb{R}^3$ such that:

$(2X^2+X)v_1=(2\alpha^2+\alpha)v_1=\beta v_1$
$(2X^2+X)v_2=(2z^2+z)v_2=\beta v_2$

Then, $\beta$ would be an eigenvalue of $M$ at least double. Contradiction.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K