Prove the inverse function theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Inverse Function Theorem, specifically demonstrating that if a function f has a continuous derivative f' that is non-zero on an interval (a,b), then its inverse f^{-1} is continuously differentiable on the corresponding interval (c,d). The proof involves showing that f is one-to-one through contradiction, establishing that f' must not change signs or equal zero. Additionally, using the function f(x)=x^3 illustrates that the theorem fails if f' equals zero at any point in (a,b), leading to discontinuity in the inverse function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Inverse Function Theorem
  • Knowledge of continuous functions and their derivatives
  • Familiarity with proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Basic calculus concepts, including differentiability and monotonicity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Inverse Function Theorem in different contexts
  • Explore examples of functions where f' equals zero and analyze their inverses
  • Learn about the conditions under which a function is one-to-one
  • Investigate the relationship between a function and its inverse through derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of differentiable functions and their inverses.

wany
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that f' exists and is continuous on a nonempty, open interval (a,b) with [itex]f'(x) \neq 0[/itex] for all [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex].
I already proved that f is 1-1 on (a,b) and takes (a,b) onto some open interval (c,d).
(i)Show that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is continuously differentiable on (c,d).
(ii)Using the function f(x)=x^3 show that (i) is false if the assumption [itex]f'(x) \neq 0[/itex] fails to hold for some [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Just to make sure to prove that f is 1-1 I did this through:
Proof by contradiction: suppose f is not 1-1 on (a,b)
therefore the slope must change signs or be 0 for some x in (a,b). So f' must be 0 or change signs. Since f' is continuous f' will =0 for some value. But this is a contradiction. So f has to be 1-1.
since f' exists on (a,b), f:(a,b) [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] (c,d).(i)By definition, since f' is continuous on (a,b) then f is continuously differentiable on (a,b).
The Inverse Function Theorem let's us say since f' exists and is continuous on (a,b), that is for any [itex]x \in (a,b)[/itex], f'(x)=y such that [itex]y \in (c,d)[/itex].
Then from this can we say that [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] is differentiable on (c,d) or is another step required, such that f is onto (c,d)?

(ii) so I am not sure how to do this but we must show that at some point the derivative of f=0 implies that the inverse of f will not be continuous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You need to relate [tex](f^{-1})'[/tex] to [tex]f'[/tex] and use the properties of [tex]f'[/tex].
 


So by the inverse function theorem we know that [itex](f^{-1})'(c)=\frac{1}{f'(a)}[/itex]
assuming that c=f(a)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K