Prove Uniqueness Theorem: |\phi(t) - \psi(t)| ≤ ∫0t

  • Thread starter Thread starter thedude36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Uniqueness
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the uniqueness theorem, specifically the inequality |\phi(t) - \psi(t)| ≤ ∫0t 2s[\phi(t) - \psi(t)] ds. The user seeks clarification on the justification for the inequality, particularly how the absolute value of the integral can be shown to be less than or equal to the integral of the absolute value. The discussion highlights that since s is always positive in the interval, the absolute value of the integrand increases the result, confirming the validity of the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with the concept of absolute values in mathematical inequalities.
  • Knowledge of the uniqueness theorem in differential equations.
  • Experience with manipulating integrals and inequalities in mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of integrals and absolute values in calculus.
  • Review the uniqueness theorem in the context of differential equations.
  • Learn about the implications of positive functions in integrals.
  • Explore examples of inequalities involving integrals to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or differential equations, and anyone involved in mathematical proofs and inequalities will benefit from this discussion.

thedude36
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I am having to justify the steps in a proof of the uniqueness theorem. I am supposed to show why the inequality follows from the initial equation.

http://i.imgur.com/AxApogj.png

[itex]\phi[/itex](t) - [itex]\psi[/itex](t) =∫0t 2s[[itex]\phi[/itex](t) - [itex]\psi[/itex](t)] ds


|[itex]\phi[/itex](t) - [itex]\psi[/itex](t)| =|∫0t 2s[[itex]\phi[/itex](t) - [itex]\psi[/itex](t)] ds| [itex]\leq[/itex] ∫0t 2s|[[itex]\phi[/itex](t) - [itex]\psi[/itex](t)]| ds , with t>0

I have no idea where to start. Mostly, I am unsure as to why pulling the 2s out will make it larger than the initial absolute value. Could anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the interval, s is always positive, but the other term may vary in sign. That would lead to some cancellation during the integration process. If we take the absolute value of the integrand, it can only increase the result:
|∫0t 2s[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)] ds| ≤ ∫0t |2s[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)]| ds = ∫0t 2s|[ϕ(t) - ψ(t)]| ds
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K