Prove: x_m Is Not Bounded Above, x_m Does Not Converge

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff1evesque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Sequence
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let [tex]x_m = 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + ... \frac{1}{m}, m \in N[/tex].
Prove [tex]x_m[/tex] is not bounded above and therefore [tex]x_m[/tex] does not converge.

Homework Equations


We know from our class an important theorem stating that:
If sequence converges then the sequence is bounded.

Thus we can say if the sequence is not bounded then it is not convergent.

The Attempt at a Solution


By above (#2), i just have to show our sequence is not bounded. This means i have the following claim:
[tex]x_m[/tex] is not bounded above if and only if given any S > 0 , there exists m such that [tex]x_m[/tex] > S.

Question:
1. Do i have to prove both sides of the argument (if and only if)? Or can I just change my claim to a one sided (left to right)?

2. Can someone help me formulate some thoughts on how to begin this proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a lot like your other post. Here's a hint. 1/3+1/4>1/2. 1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8>1/2. 1/9+1/10+...+1/15+1/16>1/2. Why?
 
Last edited: