MHB Prove $(y_n)$ Converges to a Real Number Given $|y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-n}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
The sequence \( (y_n) \) is defined such that \( |y_{n+1} - y_n| \leq 2^{-n} \), suggesting a potential convergence. The discussion centers on proving that this condition implies \( (y_n) \) is a Cauchy sequence, which would then guarantee convergence to a real number. Participants analyze the sum of differences \( |y_m - y_n| \) using the triangle inequality and the given bound, leading to the conclusion that the sequence is indeed Cauchy. Clarifications on the inequalities used in the proof are debated, ensuring the argument is solid. Ultimately, the consensus is that the sequence converges to a real number.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $(y_n)$ be a sequence of numbers such that $|y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-n}$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
Show that the sequence $(y_n)$ converges to a real number.

Doesn't $|y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-n}$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$ imply that $(y_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence?

So does it remain to show that every Cauchy sequence $(y_n)$ converges to a real number? If so how can we show this? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Let $(y_n)$ be a sequence of numbers such that $|y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-n}$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$.
Show that the sequence $(y_n)$ converges to a real number.

Doesn't $|y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-n}$ for each $n \in \mathbb{N}$ imply that $(y_n)$ is a Cauchy sequence?

So does it remain to show that every Cauchy sequence $(y_n)$ converges to a real number? If so how can we show this? (Thinking)

Hey evinda! (Smile)

If it's a Cauchy sequence, there's nothing more to do - it will converge to some real number.
However... it's not implied yet that it's a Cauchy sequence. (Worried)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey evinda! (Smile)

If it's a Cauchy sequence, there's nothing more to do - it will converge to some real number.
However... it's not implied yet that it's a Cauchy sequence. (Worried)

A ok... I have thought the following:

We fix a $n \in \mathbb{N}$. We choose a $m \geq n+1$. Then

$|y_m-y_n|=|y_m-y_{m-1}+y_{m-1}+ \dots+ y_{n+1}-y_n| \overset{\text{ Triangle inequality}}{\leq} |y_m-y_{m-1}|+ \dots+ |y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-(m-1)}+ \dots+ 2^{-n} \leq (n-m+2) 2^{-n}\leq 2^{-n+1}$.

This holds for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ so the sequence is Cauchy.
Am I right? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
$(n-m+2) 2^{-n}\leq 2^{-n+1}$.

I think this doesn't hold. (Worried)
 
I like Serena said:
I think this doesn't hold. (Worried)

Oh yes, right. It holds that $n \leq m-1$ and so $(n-m+2)2^{-n} \leq 2^{-n}$. Right?
 
evinda said:
$|y_m-y_{m-1}|+ \dots+ |y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-(m-1)}+ \dots+ 2^{-n} \leq (n-m+2) 2^{-n}\leq 2^{-n+1}$.

This holds for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$ so the sequence is Cauchy.
Am I right? (Thinking)

evinda said:
Oh yes, right. It holds that $n \leq m-1$ and so $(n-m+2)2^{-n} \leq 2^{-n}$. Right?

Hold on! (Wait)
Shouldn't it be:
$$|y_m-y_{m-1}|+ \dots+ |y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-(m-1)}+ \dots+ 2^{-n} \leq (m-n) 2^{-n}$$
? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Hold on! (Wait)
Shouldn't it be:
$$|y_m-y_{m-1}|+ \dots+ |y_{n+1}-y_n| \leq 2^{-(m-1)}+ \dots+ 2^{-n} \leq (m-n) 2^{-n}$$
? (Wondering)
Why isn't it right that

$$ 2^{-(m-1)}+ \dots+ 2^{-n} \leq (m-n) 2^{-n} \leq (n-(m-1)+1) 2^{-n}$$

? (Thinking)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K