Proving [A,B]=0 for Simultaneous Eigenkets of A and B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Foster
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the commutation relation [A,B] for observables A and B, specifically in the context of their simultaneous eigenkets |a_n,b_n⟩. The original poster questions whether it can be concluded that [A,B]=0 given that these eigenkets form a complete orthonormal set.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents a solution involving the properties of eigenkets and questions the validity of certain steps in the proof. They seek clarification on the implications of the eigenvalue equations for A and B.
  • Another participant confirms the eigenvalue relationships and expands on the reasoning by applying linearity to derive expressions for AB|a_n,b_n⟩ and BA|a_n,b_n⟩.
  • Further inquiry is made into the validity of factoring terms in the expression for [A,B], suggesting a potential simplification based on the nature of the eigenvalues.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the mathematical relationships between the operators A and B and their eigenkets. Clarifications are being sought regarding the steps in the proof, and some participants are contributing additional reasoning that supports the original poster's inquiry.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the eigenkets |a_n,b_n⟩ are complete and orthonormal, and they are examining the implications of this setup on the commutation relation. There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions and properties of the operators involved.

Bill Foster
Messages
334
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A and B be observables. Suppose the simultaneous eigenkets of A and B \left{|a_n,b_n\rangle\right} form a complete orthonormal set of base kets. Can we always conclude that [A,B]=0 ? If “yes”, prove it. If “no”, give a counterexample.

The Attempt at a Solution



One solution is given as follows:

\sum_m |a_m,b_m\rangle\langle a_m,b_m|=1
\sum_n |a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|=1

\left[A,B\right]=AB-BA
=\sum_m |a_m,b_m\rangle\langle a_m,b_m|\left(AB-BA\right)\sum_n |a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\sum_m |a_m,b_m\rangle\langle a_m,b_m|\left(AB-BA\right)|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\sum_m |a_m,b_m\rangle\langle a_m,b_m|\left(AB|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-BA|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=\sum_n\sum_m |a_m,b_m\rangle\langle a_m,b_m|\left(a_n b_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-b_n a_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=0

My question is this: how is it known that the following is true?

AB|a_n,b_n\rangle = a_n b_n|a_n,b_n\rangle
BA|a_n,b_n\rangle = b_n a_n|a_n,b_n\rangle

And since it is true, why can the following be an equally valid solution?

\left[A,B\right]=\left(AB-BA\right)\sum_n |a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\left(AB-BA\right)|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\left(AB|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-BA|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=\sum_n\left(a_n b_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-b_n a_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition |a_n,b_n\rangle are eigenkets of A and B with eigenvalues an and bn:

A|a_n,b_n\rangle = a_n|a_n,b_n\rangle
B|a_n,b_n\rangle = b_n|a_n,b_n\rangle

Using the previous equations and linearity of A and B you have:

BA|a_n,b_n\rangle = Ba_n|a_n,b_n\rangle = a_nB|a_n,b_n\rangle = a_nb_n|a_n,b_n\rangle
AB|a_n,b_n\rangle = Ab_n|a_n,b_n\rangle = b_nA|a_n,b_n\rangle = b_na_n|a_n,b_n\rangle
 
Bill Foster said:
And since it is true, why can the following be an equally valid solution?

\left[A,B\right]=\left(AB-BA\right)\sum_n |a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\left(AB-BA\right)|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|
=\sum_n\left(AB|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-BA|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=\sum_n\left(a_n b_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|-b_n a_n|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|\right)
=0

If a_n and b_n are both numbers, can't we say (inserting this between the last two lines above)

[A,B]=\sum_n\left(a_n b_n-b_na_n\right)|a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|

that is, factor out |a_n,b_n\rangle\langle a_n,b_n|? Then from this, since they are numbers, a_nb_n-b_na_n=a_nb_n-a_nb_n=0
 
Yep. Looks like this one is done, too.

Danke.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K