Proving a certain orthogonal matrix is a rotation matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a 2x2 orthogonal matrix U with determinant 1 is a rotation matrix. The participant successfully derives the matrix form U = \begin{pmatrix} x & \mp \sqrt{1-x^2}\\ \pm \sqrt{1-x^2} & x \end{pmatrix} and establishes that for all allowed values of x, there exists an angle θ such that x = cos(θ) or x = sin(θ). This confirms that U corresponds to a rotation matrix. The conclusion emphasizes that the matrix representation inherently defines a rotation about an angle θ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orthogonal matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of determinants and their implications in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their relationship to rotation
  • Basic concepts of matrix representation in 2D transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of rotation matrices
  • Explore the derivation of rotation matrices using trigonometric identities
  • Investigate the relationship between determinants and matrix transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of rotation matrices and their applications in transformations.

ELB27
Messages
117
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Let ##U## be a ##2\times 2## orthogonal matrix with ##\det U = 1##. Prove that ##U## is a rotation matrix.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, my strategy was to simply write the matrix as
$$U = \begin{pmatrix}
a & b\\
c & d
\end{pmatrix}$$
and using the given properties to solve for ##a,b,c## and ##d##. I have 4 equations:
1. Determinant = 1
2. ##U^TU = I## where ##I## is identity
where the last property gives me 3 equations (one of the entries is redundant). Thus, I have 4 equations in 4 unknowns. When I solve them, I get 1 free variable, and my matrix turns out to be of the form:
$$U = \begin{pmatrix}
x & \mp \sqrt{1-x^2}\\
\pm \sqrt{1-x^2} & x
\end{pmatrix}$$
and since all entries must be real (orthogonal matrix) we have the constraint on ##x##:
$$-1≤x≤1$$
Clearly, these properties are satisfied if we let ##x=\cos\theta## or ##x=\sin\theta##, thus obtaining a rotation matrix in its standard notation. However, I do not see how to prove that these trigonometric functions are the only possible solutions. Also, how does one define formally and rigorously a rotation matrix? Only as a matrix of cosines and sines (with the appropriate values of determinant etc.)?

Any suggestions/comments will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ELB27 said:
Clearly, these properties are satisfied if we let x=cosθ or x=sinθ, thus obtaining a rotation matrix in its standard notation. However, I do not see how to prove that these trigonometric functions are the only possible solutions. Also, how does one define formally and rigorously a rotation matrix? Only as a matrix of cosines and sines (with the appropriate values of determinant etc.)?
There is no need for that. You've done all things needed. You have shown that for all allowed values of x, there exists a ##\theta## that either ##x=\sin\theta ## or ##x=\cos\theta##. It means for all allowed values of x, this matrix corresponds to a rotation. It may correspond to many other things, but that doesn't matter. All we care about now, is that it corresponds to a rotation. So you're done with this question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HallsofIvy and ELB27
Shyan said:
There is no need for that. You've done all things needed. You have shown that for all allowed values of x, there exists a ##\theta## that either ##x=\sin\theta ## or ##x=\cos\theta##. It means for all allowed values of x, this matrix corresponds to a rotation. It may correspond to many other things, but that doesn't matter. All we care about now, is that it corresponds to a rotation. So you're done with this question.
Ah, I think I get it. Basically, the question can be rephrased as "Prove the ##U## can be represented as a rotation matrix."? Thus my proof will end as:
##x=\cos\theta \ ∀x## for some angle ##\theta## and thus, ##U## is always a rotation matrix about some angle ##\theta##.

Thanks for the reply!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K