Proving a function is integrable over Jordan Region

  • Thread starter Thread starter SNOOTCHIEBOOCHEE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x, y) = x + y is integrable over the Jordan region E = [0, 1] × [0, 1]. By applying Definition 12.17, it is established that for any ε > 0, a grid G can be formed such that the difference between the upper sum U(f, G) and the lower sum L(f, G) is less than ε. The approach involves dividing the region into n^2 squares, where the maximum and minimum values of f on each square are bounded, leading to the conclusion that the difference between the upper and lower sums approaches zero as n increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Jordan regions in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of upper and lower sums in integration
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence in mathematical analysis
  • Ability to construct grids for partitioning regions in R²
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Jordan regions in detail
  • Learn how to construct upper and lower sums for various functions
  • Explore the concept of limits and their application in integration
  • Investigate the implications of partitioning in Riemann integration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration and analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of proving integrability in Jordan regions.

SNOOTCHIEBOOCHEE
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let E = [0, 1] × [0, 1] be a Jordan region and f : E --> R be defined as
f(x, y) = x + y.

By using the definition 12.17, show that f is integrable on [0, 1]×[0, 1]. I.e., form proper
grids to prove the integrability.

Homework Equations



Definition 12.17 (i shortened it):

F is integrable on E if for all epsilon >0 there exists a grid G such that

U(f,g)- L(f,g)< epsilon

(U(f,g) is the upper sum)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok i honestly don't know how to define a grid G.

This seems like a really simple question unless there is something i am not getting, i figure the best way to approach this problem is just to come straight out and define a grid g.

Edit: wait. i think that the sup will always be 1 over this entire region, which means that U(f,g) <1 ... but i don't know where to go from there,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can anybody help me?
 
You want to split the domain into rectangles in such a way that the upper sum minus the lower sum can be made arbitrarily small if you use enough rectangles. Split [0,1] into n parts so you are splitting the region into n^2 squares. The problem is simple enough that there are two ways to go about this. You could actually find explicit formulas for the upper and lower sum and show they have a common limit. I don't recommend this. It involves details that aren't important. The other way is to show that the difference between the maximum and the minimum of the function on each square is bounded by a constant times (1/n). Suggest a constant. The area of each (1/n)x(1/n) square is 1/n^2. That would mean that the difference between the upper and lower contribution to the sum on each square is bounded by your constant times 1/n^3. Now there are n^2 squares. Can you show the difference between the upper and lower sum goes to zero as n goes to infinity?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K