Proving Acceleration of A ≤ Acceleration of B

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohitarura
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the accelerations of two masses, MA (1 kg) and MB (2 kg), connected by a massless spring under the influence of a 4 N force acting on MB. It is established that the acceleration of mass A (aA) is not necessarily less than or equal to the acceleration of mass B (aB). By analyzing the forces acting on each mass and using the equations 4 - kx = 2aB and kx = aA, it is demonstrated that varying the spring force (kx) can lead to scenarios where aA exceeds aB, thus disproving the initial assumption.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of mass, force, and acceleration
  • Knowledge of spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Ability to analyze systems in the center of mass frame
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's second law of motion in detail
  • Explore the implications of Hooke's Law on spring dynamics
  • Learn about the center of mass and its relevance in multi-body systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying forces on connected mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly in understanding the dynamics of connected mass systems and spring forces.

rohitarura
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question :
two masses MA = 1 kg and MB = 2 kg are connected by a massless spring as shown in figure. A force of 4 N acts on the 2 kg mass.
http://www.vidyamandir.com//displayImageServlet?appletImgId=8a7b221f1fcc7894011ff9cccfe412f0 Is it necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B?
If yes,then prove it...If no then also prove it,please.
2. The attempt at a solution
I thought this way..Working in centre of mass's frame,both blocks seem to oscillate about it.So,at some instant both will have same accelerations w.r.t. Centre of mass then, using pseudo force concept the net acc. of the block be will get greater than that of block A..
Correct me if i am wrong...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


What forces act on A? On B?
 


Only one force acts and that on B only.
 


rohitarura said:
Only one force acts and that on B only.
There's only one external force acting on the two-block system, but to find the acceleration of each block consider each block separately.

What forces act on each? Compare the expressions for the net force on each, then see if you can draw any conclusions.
 


But, the forces on each keep varying??

We can have the equations,
4-kx=2aB
kx=aA

k being the unknown spring constant,and x is extension in it..

If we can prove,
a(B)-a(A)=2-kx/3 can be negative then its done...
 


If you are considering block B alone, why do you have twice the mass of B?
 


rohitarura said:
But, the forces on each keep varying??
Right, the spring force can be almost anything. That's the key.

We can have the equations,
4-kx=2aB
kx=aA
OK. So then:
aB = 2 -kx/2
aA = kx

Can you think of a value of kx that makes aA > aB ?
 


Ya, kx=1N?

So, what does this imply?
 


rohitarura said:
Ya, kx=1N?
No, that value makes aB = 3/2 & aA = 1. Choose another. (What value would make aB = 0?)
 
  • #10


Earlier i accidentally took its opposite

Taking,kx=4N,will make it..
 
  • #11


rohitarura said:
Taking,kx=4N,will make it..
OK. So what does that tell you?
 
  • #12


It tells that it is not necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B...But my fellows says the opposite?He says if 1 force is pulling such a system then acc. of the block A can't be greater than that of the block on which the force is applied i.e.,block B??
 
  • #13


rohitarura said:
It tells that it is not necessary that the acceleration of A always be less or equal to the acceleration of B...
OK.
But my fellows says the opposite?He says if 1 force is pulling such a system then acc. of the block A can't be greater than that of the block on which the force is applied i.e.,block B??
Ask him why he thinks that.

No information is given about how much the spring is stretched, so nothing stops us from imagining a situation where the stretch is as much as we like.
 
  • #14


Thank you very very much Sir.I'm very satisfied with your valuable views...Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
560
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K