Proving Closed Sets in Topological Spaces: Strategies and Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter demonelite123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of closed sets within topological spaces, specifically focusing on the relationship between sets K, F, and G. The original poster seeks to establish that if K is closed in G and F is closed in K, then F is also closed in G.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reframe the problem by considering the openness of complements and exploring relationships between sets. They question the necessity of visual aids in understanding set relationships and proofs.
  • Some participants clarify the original poster's intent and correct a typographical error regarding the sets involved.
  • Others suggest a direct approach to proving that F is closed in G by examining the complement of F.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the topology on K being derived from G, which may influence the understanding of open and closed sets in this context. The original poster's reliance on visual aids suggests a potential challenge in grasping the abstract concepts involved.

demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
i want to prove that given a set K in G that is closed and a set F in K that is closed, then K is closed in G. K, F, and G are all topological spaces.

so to reword the problem i instead want to show that given G-K is open in G and K-F is open in K show that G-F is open in G. so since G is a topological space and K is a subspace of G, i endow K with the subspace topology. then there exists some open set O in G such that any open subset of K such as K-F = O ∩ K. then F = K - (O∩K) then i drew myself a picture and found that F also equals (G-O)∩K which works because G-F = G-(G-O) ∪ (G-K) = O U (G-K) and since O is open in G and (G-K) is open in G therefore the union of those 2 sets is also open in G and G-F is then open in G which means F is closed in G.

i wish to know that in these types of proofs, is it common to have to draw pictures in order to continue? i was stuck at F = K - (O∩K) for a while until i drew a picture and saw that F = (G-O)∩K which i could take the complement of since it was a subset of G. my question is could F = (G-O)∩K be derived from F = K - (O∩K) or any of the other information i was given, without having to draw pictures to derive it? or is drawing pictures the usual way of going through these set theory types of proofs. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
demonelite123 said:
i want to prove that given a set K in G that is closed and a set F in K that is closed, then K is closed in G. K, F, and G are all topological spaces.
so haven't you said K is closed in G already? and you want to show K is closed in G?

do you mean:
- F is closed in K
- K is closed in G
show F is closed in G
 
oh whoops. i made a typo there. yes you are correct. if K in G is closed and F in K is closed i want to show that F in G is closed.
 
The most direct way to show F is closed in G is to show that its complement is open. Let H be the complement of F in G. Of course, The complement of F in K is just H intersect K.

The topology on K is the topology of G restricted to K. That is, every open set in K is equal to a set open in G intersect K.
 
thanks! your proof was a lot more concise than mines.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K