Proving Commutativity of Linear Transformations Using Schur Decomposition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the commutativity of a linear transformation T and its adjoint T* in a finite-dimensional unitarian space. The original poster attempts to leverage the properties of Jordan matrices and eigenvectors to establish a basis that simplifies the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Jordan decomposition and question the existence of a suitable basis for T and T*. Others suggest considering Schur decomposition as an alternative approach, emphasizing the implications of upper triangular forms and eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing alternative methods and clarifications. There is a focus on the implications of different decompositions and their relevance to the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are exploring definitions and properties of unitarian spaces and the implications of using different matrix decompositions. There is a noted uncertainty regarding the existence of a specific basis that would facilitate the proof.

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


V is a unitarian space of finite dimensions and T:V->V is a linear transformation.
Every eigenvector of T is an eigenvector of T* (where (Tv,u) = (v,T*u) for all u and v in V).
Prove that T(T*) = (T*)T.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, since the space in unitarian both T and T* can be expressed as a jordan matrix. It's easy to show that if J is the jordan matrix of T then [tex]\bar{J}[/tex] is the jordan matrix of T*. My idea is that since every eigenvector of T is an eigenvector of T* then there exists some base of V where T is expressed as J and T* is expressed as [tex]\bar{J}[/tex]. If that where true than it would be easy to answer the question
(Since then there would be a matrix M to that [tex][T] = M^{-1}JM[/tex] ,
[tex][T^{*}] = M^{-1} \bar{J} M[/tex] and then
[tex][T^{*}][T] = M^{-1} \bar{J} M M^{-1} J M = M^{-1} \bar{J} J M = <br /> J M^{-1} \bar{J} M = [T][T^{*}][/tex]
but I can't prove that such a base exists. In all the examples I've tried there's a base like that.
Is this the right direction? If so, how do I prove that a base exists?
Is there a better way to approach the problem?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you clarify what you mean by a unitarian space?
 
A unitarian space is a vector space over the complex field with a defined inner-product.
 
In that case it would be better to use Schur decomposition rather than Jordan decomposition. That is, get a unitary matrix U such that U*TU is upper triangular. Note that T commutes with T* iff U*TU commutes with (U*TU)*=U*T*U. Moreover, note that x is an eigenvector of T iff U*x is an eigenvector of U*TU. Thus we may assume without loss of generality that T itself is upper triangular. In this case T has (1,0,..,0) as an eigenvector. Consequently, so does T*. Proceed inductively to conclude that T must be diagonal. (We've essentially 'chopped off' the upper left corners of both T and T*.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K