Proving Continuity of a Polynomial Function at a Zero of Another Polynomial

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the continuity of the function p/q at a zero x0 of another polynomial q, specifically when x0 is a zero of q of multiplicity m. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the problem's requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest expressing the polynomials p and q in terms of their roots and degrees, particularly focusing on the multiplicity of the zeros. Others mention the concept of extending functions by defining limits at points where they are not originally defined.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different representations of the polynomials and discussing the implications of their forms on the continuity of the function p/q. There is an ongoing clarification regarding the correct use of polynomial notation and the relationships between p and q.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the multiplicity of zeros and the conditions under which the function can be defined at x0. Some participants question the definitions and relationships between the polynomials involved.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let p and q be a polynomial and x0 be a zero of q of multiplicity m. Prove that p/q can be assigned a value at x0 such that the function thus defined will be continuous there iff x0 is a zero of p of multiplicity greater than or equal to m.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not quite sure how to even get started. This question just confuses me in what it's asking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If f(x) is a polynomial, and has a zero at x0 of degree m, then there exists a polynomial g(x) such that f(x) = g(x)*(x-x0)m

As written, p/q (if q has a zero at x0) is not defined at x0, but is defined continuously in a ball around x0. A standard trick is to extend functions by finding what their limit is as you approach points that aren't in the original domain, and then defining a new function that equals the original function on the original domain, and if you're on one of the non-defined points, you define it to be the limit of the original function.

So try writing p and q in the form I gave at the top of my post, and then use the tip to consider the relative degrees of the roots and figure out if the limit as x approaches x0 exists
 
Office_Shredder said:
If f(x) is a polynomial, and has a zero at x0 of degree m, then there exists a polynomial g(x) such that f(x) = g(x)*(x-x0)m

As written, p/q (if q has a zero at x0) is not defined at x0, but is defined continuously in a ball around x0. A standard trick is to extend functions by finding what their limit is as you approach points that aren't in the original domain, and then defining a new function that equals the original function on the original domain, and if you're on one of the non-defined points, you define it to be the limit of the original function.

So try writing p and q in the form I gave at the top of my post, and then use the tip to consider the relative degrees of the roots and figure out if the limit as x approaches x0 exists
Ok so p: there exists a polynomial q such that p=q*(x-x0)m
Is this right then do the same for q?
 
kathrynag said:
Ok so p: there exists a polynomial q such that p=q*(x-x0)m
Is this right then do the same for q?

or p=r*(x-x0)m?
 
Office Shredder said p(x)= g(x)(x- x0)m, NOT "q(x)(x- x0)m". You cannot use "q" to mean two different polynomials.

Don't write "p(x)= q(x)(x- x0)m" or "p= r(x- x0)m). Do what Office Shredder suggested!
 
Ok, so I have p=g(x)(x-[tex]x_{0}[/tex])[tex]^{m}[/tex]
q=g(x)(x-[tex]x_{0}[/tex])[tex]^{n}[/tex]
p/q=(x-[tex]x_{0}[/tex])[tex]^{m-n}[/tex]
 
I'm just confused on where to go next... Like do I do a delta, epsilon proof?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K