Proving Continuity of Additive & Subadditive Functions at 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter adamantium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the continuity of additive and subadditive functions at zero, specifically focusing on two parts: the continuity of an additive function throughout the real numbers if it is continuous at zero, and the continuity of a subadditive function across the reals given its continuity at zero and that it equals zero at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their approach to the first part of the problem, demonstrating the continuity of an additive function. They express uncertainty about how to tackle the second part, particularly regarding the inequality involved in subadditive functions. Other participants question the clarity of the original poster's proof and suggest that the problem may be simpler than presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback and prompting the original poster to clarify their reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the continuity conditions for both additive and subadditive functions, but no consensus has been reached on the second part of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the original poster's exhaustion due to concurrent midterms, which may be impacting their ability to see the solution clearly. There is also a mention of needing to show work to receive help, indicating a potential constraint on the discussion.

adamantium
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a HW problem that asks in two parts to prove i) that if an additive function is continuous at 0 then it is continuous in R, and ii) if a subadditive function is continuous at 0 and f(0)=0 then the subadditive function is on R. I did the first part but don't know how to do the second. Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some work to get help. How did you do the first part? It seems like a pretty simple extension to get the second part, so where are you getting stuck?
 
Ok for the first part I showed that for any z (real number) and m (natural number) f((m+1)z)=f(mz) + f(z)=(m+1)f(z). Next f(0) has to equal zero since f(0 + 0)=f(0) + f(0)=f(0). Now f(mz-mz)=f(mz) + f(-mz) which implies f(-mz)=-f(mz) therefore f(mz)=mf(z) for every m (integer). Now for any z' (real number) f(z')=f(nz'/n)=nf(z'/n). Therefore f(mz'/n)=mf(z'/n)=m/n[f(z')] for m (integer) and n (natural number). If we take z'=1 we get f(r)=rf(1) for r (rational number). Finally since f is continuous at 0, there exists a delta such that abs[f(x)]<epsilon. This implies x' (real number) is also less than epsilon in the delta nbd of x. Therefore f(x) is continuous for any x' (real number).

Okay for the second part, I don't how to deal with the inequality.
 
Sorry, I have been working on three midterms and am a bit exhausted. It maybe in front of my face, but I can't see it.
 
I'm not sure I follow your proof, but it seems to be overcomplicating things. Note that to show f is continuous at x, you just need to show that for any e>0, there is a d>0 with |f(x+y)-f(x)|<e for all y with |y|<d. It should be clear that the additivity of f implies this is equivalent to continuity at x=0. For the sub-additive one, do the same thing, and the inequality should work in your favor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K