Proving Convergence of {S_n/n} for Bounded Sequence {S_n}

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the convergence of the sequence {S_n/n} given that {S_n} is a bounded sequence within an interval [a,b]. The participants are exploring concepts related to bounded sequences, convergence, and the application of the Squeeze theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the Squeeze theorem to demonstrate convergence, questioning whether it is sufficient to show that the bounds a/n and b/n converge to 0. There is uncertainty about the implications of the Squeeze theorem for the convergence of the entire sequence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights about the Squeeze theorem and its application. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the relationship between the bounds and the convergence of the sequence, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they have not yet learned about Cauchy sequences and are limited to the definitions of bounded sequences and convergence. There is also a concern about the implications of the limits of a/n and b/n as n approaches infinity.

Shayes
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If {S_n} is a sequence whose values lie inside an interval [a,b], prove {S_n/n} is convergent.

We don't know Cauchy sequence yet. All we know is the definition of a bounded sequence, and convergence and divergence of sequences. Along with comparison tests and Squeeze theorem.

Homework Equations



Limit of a sequence: abs(S_n - L) < Epsilon whenever n>=N, provided for Epsilon>0.

The Attempt at a Solution



I see that every convergent sequence is bounded, but the opposite isn't always true, so how do I show that the smaller sequence is convergent given that {S_n} is bounded?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you can use the squeeze theorem, since a/n <= S_n/n <= b/n and they both converge to 0. Do you need to proove that a/n converges or can you use that?
 


susskind_leon said:
I think you can use the squeeze theorem, since a/n <= S_n/n <= b/n and they both converge to 0. Do you need to proove that a/n converges or can you use that?

i thought of that, but is that the same as saying the entire sequence converges?

i feel like this statement says that each term is squeezed between the interval, but it doesn't say anything about if the limit of the sequence's terms is taken to infinity.
 


Yes it does! Check the squeeze theorem carefully!
 


Shayes said:
i thought of that, but is that the same as saying the entire sequence converges?

i feel like this statement says that each term is squeezed between the interval
I have no idea what this means, but the crucial point is the "n" in the denominator. What are the linits of a/n and b/n?

, but it doesn't say anything about if the limit of the sequence's terms is taken to infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K