MHB Proving Degrees of Vertices in Graph G

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degrees Graph
Click For Summary
In a graph G of order \(2n+1 \geq 5\), the degree of each vertex is either \(n+1\) or \(n+2\). The discussion revolves around proving that G must contain at least \(n+1\) vertices of degree \(n+2\) or at least \(n+2\) vertices of degree \(n+1\). An argument by contradiction is suggested, where assuming fewer vertices of each degree leads to a contradiction when counting edges. The conclusion is that the initial conditions cannot hold true without satisfying the degree requirements. Thus, the proof demonstrates the necessity of the stated vertex degree distribution in graph G.
Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
The degree of every vertex of a graph G of order \[2n+1 \geq 5\] is either n+1 or n+2. Prove that G contains at least n+1 vertices of degree n+2 or at least n+2 vertex
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this question complete? It seems truncated.
 
The degree of every vertex of a graph G of order \[2n+1 \geq 5\] is either n+1 or n+2. Prove that G contains at least n+1 vertices of degree n+2 or at least n+2 vertex of degree n+1
 
Amer said:
The degree of every vertex of a graph G of order \[2n+1 \geq 5\] is either n+1 or n+2. Prove that G contains at least n+1 vertices of degree n+2 or at least n+2 vertices of degree n+1
Try using an argument by contradiction. Suppose that there are $x$ vertices of degree $n+1$, and $y$ vertices of degree $n+2$, and suppose that the result is false. Then $x\leqslant n+1$ and $y\leqslant n$. But $x+y=2n+1$. It follows that we must have $x=n+1$ and $y=n.$ By counting the number of edges in the graph, show that this leads to a contradiction.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
962
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K