Proving Discontinuity at Integers for f(x) = [x2]-[x]2

  • Thread starter Thread starter vkash
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = [x²] - [x]², where [x] denotes the greatest integer function, is proven to be discontinuous for all integral values except 1. Participants in the discussion confirmed that discontinuities also occur at points ±√k, where k is a whole number from 0 to infinity. The limits as x approaches 1 from both sides were evaluated, reinforcing the conclusion that f(x) is continuous at x = 1 but discontinuous at other integer values. The question posed was deemed correctly worded, despite the presence of additional discontinuities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the greatest integer function (floor function).
  • Familiarity with limits and continuity in calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of discontinuous functions.
  • Ability to evaluate functions over specified intervals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the properties of the greatest integer function and its implications on continuity.
  • Study the concept of limits, particularly one-sided limits, in calculus.
  • Explore discontinuous functions and their classifications.
  • Investigate graphing software that supports the greatest integer function and fractional part functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those studying continuity and discontinuity in functions.

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
first of all see question
question:-> Prove that f(x) = [x2]-[x]2 is discontinuous for all integrals values except 1.[/color]
[x] denotes greatest integer function OR [x] means greatest integer less than or equal to x.

I think this is discontinuous for +- sqrt(k) where k denotes an whole number(0,inf).
try values you will get the point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question?
 
SammyS said:
What is your question?

Is this question correct or not. (red part)
OR
either this question correct or incorrect.(red part)
question is marked as red and my explanation is in black words.
 
vkash said:
first of all see question
question:-> Prove that f(x) = [x2]-[x]2 is discontinuous for all integral values except 1.[/color]
[x] denotes greatest integer function OR [x] means greatest integer less than or equal to x.

I think this is discontinuous for +- sqrt(k) where k denotes an whole number(0,inf).
try values you will get the point.
Yes, the question appears to be correctly worded.

You are correct in observing that it is discontinuous for additional values of x, not mentioned in the question.

As to whether the function is continuous at x = 1, what are the following limits?

lim x→1+ f(x)

lim x→1 f(x)
 
SammyS said:
Yes, the question appears to be correctly worded.

You are correct in observing that it is discontinuous for additional values of x, not mentioned in the question.

As to whether the function is continuous at x = 1, what are the following limits?

lim x→1+ f(x)

lim x→1 f(x)
thanks now i am confirmed
If any other person wants to answer then he is welcomed.
 
Evaluate f(x) on the interval 0 ≤ x < 1 and then on the interval 1 ≤ x < 1.4 .
 
SammyS said:
Evaluate f(x) on the interval 0 ≤ x < 1 and then on the interval 1 ≤ x < 1.4 .
I also so do that but in between sqrt(25) to sqrt(36).
 
So you agree that f(x) is continuous at x = 1 ?
 
SammyS said:
So you agree that f(x) is continuous at x = 1 ?
Oh man(sorry if you female) you are getting wrong meaning of my words. I mean that it has also point of dicontinouty other than '1'.
first when i do this as i see this question i feel that it will discontinous at all integers after confirming it i try to put sqrt(k) where k is whole number[0,infinity) it was also discontinous at square root of all whole numbers. then i post it here to confirm that is it wrong and now i am sure that question is wrong.
Do you know any graph drawing software that support greatest integer function and fractional part function(x-[x]). I have already one but that does not support these 2 function({} and[]).

If you want to do a beautiful question then see this. I am not requesting for help for this question. This issue is solved after 64 replies of some good persons(do you have already seen that).
Just test your root basic with this question.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Yes, as I said in post #4 of this thread, f is discontinuous for many values which are not integers. However, the problem only says to prove discontinuity at integer values other than 1.

So, it is not a wrong question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K