Proving Eigenvalues: A Unit Vector Approach for (A - λI)x = b

  • Thread starter Thread starter sana2476
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving eigenvalues using a unit vector approach. The original poster presents a scenario where the equation (A - λI)x = b is considered, with x being a unit vector, and questions how to start the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the manipulation of the equation (A - bx')x and suggest expanding it to relate it to the eigenvalue equation. There are attempts to express relationships between A, λ, b, and x, while questioning the validity of the steps taken.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on how to expand the equation and relate it to known properties of eigenvalues. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the unit vector condition and how it affects the proof. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of the properties of unit vectors and eigenvalues, as well as the implications of manipulating the original equation. There is an acknowledgment of potential assumptions or constraints in the problem setup.

sana2476
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let x be a unit vector. Namely x(Transpose)*x = 1. If (A − Let x be a unit vector. If (A − λI)x = b, then λ is an eigenvalue of A − bx(transpose).


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start this proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start like this.

[tex] (A - bx')x = (A - \lambda I + \lambda I - bx')x[/tex]

Expand the right hand side, and use facts about [tex]A, \lambda, b[/tex] and [tex]x[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Ok...so here's what I have so far..I'm not sure if I'm on the right track..

Since x(transpose)*x=1
Therefore, (A-b*x(transpose))*x=λx
So Ax - bx(transpose)x=λx
Ax-b=λx
Then Ax-λx=b
Hence you have (A-λI)x=b

I don't know if I am begging the question by doing it this way though
 
No. Look at

[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> (A - bx')x & = (A - \lambda I + \lambda I - bx') x \\<br /> & = (A - \lambda I) x + (\lambda I - bx')x<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

What do you know about

[tex] (A - \lambda I)x[/tex] ?

use that, together with what you get when you expand

[tex] (\lambda I - bx') x[/tex]

(don't forget that [tex]x' x = 1[/tex])
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K